Objective
Maternal expulsive efforts are thought to damage the pelvic floor. We aimed to compare pelvic floor function and anatomy between women who delivered vaginally (VB) versus cesarean (CD) without entering the second stage of labor.
Design
Prospective cohort
Setting
University Hospital Midwifery practice
Population
Nulliparas
Methods
Pregnant nulliparas were recruited during pregnancy and women who underwent CD prior to the 2nd stage of labor at birth were recruited immediately postpartum. Both groups were prospectively followed to 6 months postpartum.
Main Outcome Measures
POPQ, perineal ultrasound(U/S) and Paper Towel Test(PTT), an objective measure of stress incontinence; Incontinence Severity Index(ISI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire(PFIQ-7), Wexner Fecal Incontinence Scale(W) and Female Sexual Function Index(FSFI)
Results
336/448(75%)VB and 138/224(62%)CD followed up. The VB group was younger (23.9+/−4.9 vs 26.6+/−6.1 years, P<.001) and less overweight/obese (38 vs 56%, P<.001); baseline functional measures were similar(all P>.05). At followup, urinary incontinence (UI)(55 vs 46% ISI>0, P=.10), fecal incontinence(FI) (8 vs 13% FI on W, P = .12), sexual activity rates(88 vs 92%, P=.18) and PFIQ-7 scores were similar. Positive PTT tests(17 vs 6%, P=.002) and ≥Stage 2 prolapse (22 vs 15%, P=.03) were higher with VB; differences were limited to points Aa and Ba. U/S findings were not different between groups. Stepwise multivariate analyses controlling for age, BMI, and non-Hispanic White race for prolapse of points Aa and Ba did not alter conclusions (all P <.004).
Conclusions
VB resulted in prolapse changes and objective UI, but did not result in increased self-report pelvic floor dysfunction at 6 months postpartum compared to women who delivered by CD without the second stage of labor. The second stage of labor has a modest effect on postpartum pelvic floor function.