Postponing the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games: stress-testing governance in the Olympic System and limitations to Agenda 2020

Enya, Marjorie; Nagime, Mateus; Gusia, Dominik

doi:10.30937/2526-6314.v4.id90

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We support the assumption that each u i 's opinion o i is ternary, where o i ∈ {True, False, Undetermined}. If o i = True, each u i forms the opinion that the news is real (e.g., each u i is sure that the news [23] is real news). If o i = False, each u i forms the opinion that the news is fake (e.g., each u i is sure that the news [23] is fake news, but it is real news actually).…”

Section: B Problem Formulationsupporting

confidence: 64%

“…To model the communication of users' opinions about the fact of the news, we first set z ∈ {True, False} as ground truth of the news. If z = True, the news is real news (e.g., The Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games was postponed due to COVID-19 [23]). If z = False, the news is fake news (e.g., alcohol can prevent COVID-19 [3]).…”

Section: B Problem Formulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If o i = True, each u i forms the opinion that the news is real (e.g., each u i is sure that the news [23] is real news). If o i = False, each u i forms the opinion that the news is fake (e.g., each u i is sure that the news [23] is fake news, but it is real news actually). If o i = Undetermined, each u i does not form the opinion about the news (e.g., each u i is not sure about whether the news [23] is real).…”

Section: B Problem Formulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If o i = False, each u i forms the opinion that the news is fake (e.g., each u i is sure that the news [23] is fake news, but it is real news actually). If o i = Undetermined, each u i does not form the opinion about the news (e.g., each u i is not sure about whether the news [23] is real). The settings in this paragraph satisfy requirement 1.…”

Section: B Problem Formulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Fake News Dissemination Model Based on Updating Reliability and Doubt among Individuals

Yoshikawa

Awa

Kusano

et al. 2020

2020 11th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As social media has become more widely used, fake news has become an increasingly serious problem. The representative countermeasures against fake news are fake news detection and automated fact-checking. However, these countermeasures are not sufficient because people using social media tend to ignore facts that contradict their current beliefs. Therefore, developing effective countermeasures requires understanding the nature of fake news dissemination. Previous models related to this aim have been proposed for describing and analyzing opinion dissemination among people. However, these models are not adequate because they are based on the assumptions that ignore the presence of fake. That is, they assume that people believe their friends equally without doubting and that reliability among people does not change. In this paper, we propose a model that can better describe the opinion dissemination in the presence of fake news. In our model, each person updates the reliability of and doubt about his or her friends and exchanges opinions among each other. Applying the proposed model to artificial and real-world social networks, we found three clues to analyze the nature of fake news dissemination: 1) people can less accurately perceive that fake news is fake than they can perceive that real news is real. 2) it takes much more time for people to perceive fake news to be fake than to perceive real news to be real. 3) the results of findings 1 and 2 concerning fake news are because people become skeptical about friends in the presence of fake news and therefore people do not update opinions much.

show abstract

Section: B Problem Formulationsupporting

confidence: 64%

Section: B Problem Formulationmentioning

confidence: 99%