1980
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1980.44.4.751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postspike facilitation of forelimb muscle activity by primate corticomotoneuronal cells

Abstract: The strength, latency, and time course of most PSF suggest they are mediated by monosynaptic corticomotoneuronal (CM) connections, although a contribution through indirect linkages cannot be excluded. Taking the strong and moderate PSF as evidence of CM connections, the present results indicate that CM cells commonly distribute divergent terminals to motoneurons of more than one muscle. The larger muscle fields of extensor cells may reflect a greater divergence of terminals than flexor cells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
307
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 672 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
24
307
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, if the SC interneurons we recorded were inhibitory cells, their phase-inverted firing relative to excitatory inputs from M1 would produce in-phase summation of activity at the motoneuron. To assess this, we computed spiketriggered averages of EMG (30). Six cells of the SC intermediate zone produced postsynaptic facilitations (PSFs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if the SC interneurons we recorded were inhibitory cells, their phase-inverted firing relative to excitatory inputs from M1 would produce in-phase summation of activity at the motoneuron. To assess this, we computed spiketriggered averages of EMG (30). Six cells of the SC intermediate zone produced postsynaptic facilitations (PSFs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on current estimates, the PTN population in the hand representation of M1 is composed principally of slow PTNs (70-90% of the total population) (24,25,40). Physiological evidence indicates that slow as well as fast PTNs make monosynaptic connections with hand motoneurons (16,26,41). However, for largely technical reasons, it has not been possible to determine the overall size and importance of the monosynaptic input from slow PTNs to hand motoneurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the preparation consisting of the brainstem, spinal cord and vestibular organs, the activity of the RS neuron was recorded from its axon in the spinal cord, whereas the brainstem and vestibular organs were rotated in different planes to determine the control system (roll, pitch, yaw) to which the neuron belongs. Afterwards, the RS neuron was stimulated and its effects on motor output of the spinal cord were detected by means of the spike-triggered averaging technique (Fetz and Cheney, 1980). The effects were found to be similar along the whole extent of the axon (Zelenin et al 2001), and they could be characterized by a combination of influences on the four motoneuron pools in any segment (Fig.…”
Section: Postural Control In Lampreymentioning
confidence: 99%