Structural and Functional Organization of the Synapse
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77232-5_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postsynaptic Targeting of Protein Kinases and Phosphatases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 277 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key difference between signaling by NE-b 2 ARs-cAMP-PKA and by CaMKII is that the former is based on predetermined co-localization and co-assembly of all components except for NE, which is widely and diffusely released whereas CaMKII is evenly distributed throughout the dendritic shaft (Strack & Hell et al, 2008). However, stimulation of Ca 2+ influx through postsynaptic NMDARs will lead to recruitment of CaMKII to the stimulated spines as seen with ectopically expressed GFP-CaMKII (Shen & Meyer, 1999;Otmakhov et al, 2004;Rose et al, 2009) as well as endogenous CaMKII (Merrill et al, 2005;Strack & Hell et al, 2008). This recruitment depends on CaMKII binding to residues 1290-1310 in the C-terminus of GluN2B (Strack & Colbran, 1998;Leonard et al, 1999;Bayer et al, 2001;Halt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Role Of Camkii In Regulation Of Postsynaptic Ampar Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key difference between signaling by NE-b 2 ARs-cAMP-PKA and by CaMKII is that the former is based on predetermined co-localization and co-assembly of all components except for NE, which is widely and diffusely released whereas CaMKII is evenly distributed throughout the dendritic shaft (Strack & Hell et al, 2008). However, stimulation of Ca 2+ influx through postsynaptic NMDARs will lead to recruitment of CaMKII to the stimulated spines as seen with ectopically expressed GFP-CaMKII (Shen & Meyer, 1999;Otmakhov et al, 2004;Rose et al, 2009) as well as endogenous CaMKII (Merrill et al, 2005;Strack & Hell et al, 2008). This recruitment depends on CaMKII binding to residues 1290-1310 in the C-terminus of GluN2B (Strack & Colbran, 1998;Leonard et al, 1999;Bayer et al, 2001;Halt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Role Of Camkii In Regulation Of Postsynaptic Ampar Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under basal conditions endogenous CaMKII appears to be enriched by a factor of ~2 in spines compared to dendritic shafts (Feng et al, 2011; Merrill et al, 2005; Strack and Hell, 2008). Under basal conditions, ~80% of CaMKII molecules exit spines and exchange with dendritic shaft CaMKII with a time constant between 1 and 5 min (~1s for free GFP) with ~ 15% remaining firmly anchored in spines after 30 min (Lee et al, 2009; Sharma et al, 2006; Sturgill et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under basal conditions, ~80% of CaMKII molecules exit spines and exchange with dendritic shaft CaMKII with a time constant between 1 and 5 min (~1s for free GFP) with ~ 15% remaining firmly anchored in spines after 30 min (Lee et al, 2009; Sharma et al, 2006; Sturgill et al, 2009). Protein-protein interactions play a critical role in retaining CaMKII in spines, and F-actin, α-actinin, NMDARs and to some degree densin-180 are emerging as major CaMKII binding partners (Figure 2) (Strack and Hell, 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, learning, as well as LTP, requires both, Ca 2+ influx through the NMDAR (NMDA‐type glutamate receptor) and the ensuing CaMKII (calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase II) activation (Martin et al , 2000; Collingridge et al , 2004; Malenka and Bear, 2004; Kerchner and Nicoll, 2008; Lisman and Hell, 2008; Kessels and Malinow, 2009). Ca 2+ influx stimulates not only CaMKII activity but also CaMKII binding to the NMDAR (Strack and Colbran, 1998; Leonard et al , 1999; Bayer et al , 2006) and CaMKII accumulation at postsynaptic sites (Shen and Meyer, 1999; Bayer et al , 2006; Strack and Hell, 2008). This mechanism supports selective enrichment of CaMKII at synapses that are undergoing potentiation upon repeated glutamate uncaging, a model for LTP (Zhang et al , 2008; Lee et al , 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%