2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2006.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posttraining handling facilitates memory for auditory-cue fear conditioning in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although males are handled for 3 days postoperatively, and daily during behavioral testing, our females experienced slightly more handling during the few days between postoperative care and the start of fear conditioning as a necessary result of estrous cycle monitoring. As handling experience can affect behavior in a number of different paradigms (Hoffman et al, 2010;Hui et al, 2006), it is possible that the slight discrepancy in handling of males vs females could have affected the outcome in our study. However, sex differences in handling effects are most commonly reported in animals exposed to handling during prepubertal periods (Kosten et al, 2007;Raineki et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although males are handled for 3 days postoperatively, and daily during behavioral testing, our females experienced slightly more handling during the few days between postoperative care and the start of fear conditioning as a necessary result of estrous cycle monitoring. As handling experience can affect behavior in a number of different paradigms (Hoffman et al, 2010;Hui et al, 2006), it is possible that the slight discrepancy in handling of males vs females could have affected the outcome in our study. However, sex differences in handling effects are most commonly reported in animals exposed to handling during prepubertal periods (Kosten et al, 2007;Raineki et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One would therefore need an account with mechanisms that prevent a labile memory from being updated with the new information that occurs during the extinction trial. Some studies suggest that even minimally invasive procedures during periods of memory consolidation can strengthen the fear response (Hui et al 2006), as can other behavioral and pharmacological enhancements of the stress response (McGaugh 2006;McGaugh and Roozendaal 2009). Thus, the simple experience of being returned to a fearful context while the organism is in an aroused state may prevent extinction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in physiological arousal produced by epinephrine in pre-exposed animals resulted in very high rates of freezing to the CS that were quite similar to that observed in non-pre-exposed animals tested in experiments 1 and 2. In addition, when physiological arousal is increased by handling following cued fear conditioning (Hui et al 2006), administering epinephrine or corticosterone after learning tasks such as object recognition Dornelles et al 2007), viewing a series of neutral slides (Cahill and Alkire 2003), or receiving a footshock in a distinct context (Introini-Collison and McGaugh 1988), memory for the CS, the location of objects, slides viewed, or the context where given a footshock is improved. The findings from experiment 3 further suggest heightened states of arousal impact memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%