The pace has quickened in circadian biology research. In particular, an abundance of results focused on post-translational modifications (PTMs) is sharpening our view of circadian molecular clockworks. PTMs affect nearly all aspects of clock biology; in some cases they are essential for clock function and in others, they provide layers of regulatory fine-tuning. Our goal is to review recent advances in clock PTMs, help make sense of emerging themes, and spotlight intriguing and perhaps controversial new findings. We focus on PTMs affecting the core functions of eukaryotic clocks, in particular the functionally related oscillators in Neurospora crassa, Drosophila melanogaster, and mammalian cells.
Post-translational modifications emerge on the sceneAs our understanding of eukaryotic clocks has shifted focus from organismal behavior to molecular underpinnings, in the broadest description these clocks consist of a positively acting driver that is periodically suppressed by an inhibitory brake (Fig 1). More specifically, heterodimeric positively-acting PAS (named for Per-ARNT-Sim motifs) domain-containing transcription factors (+TFs) activate the transcription of negatively acting factors (−Fs). These, in turn, feed back to inhibit the activity of the +TFs for long periods of time, thus setting the phase of transcription and determining the length of the feedback cycle. [1][2][3] This core circadian circuit is broadly controlled by post-translational modifications (PTMs). Indeed, recent evidence points to a clock based entirely on PTMs in cyanobacteria (Box 1), although this review does not focus on this system. What did we know about PTMs within these circuits circa 2004? Phosphorylation of −Fs was typical, rhythmic, and phase specific 4, 5 and appeared to be the major contribution to determining the very long (circa 24 h) time constant of the feedback loop 6 . More nuanced studies showed that the activity state of +TFs that shuttled between cytoplasm and nucleus 7 was accompanied by changes in histone acetylation 8 and chromatin remodeling 9 , and there were hints that phosphorylation of +TFs 10 increased their transcriptional activity 11 and targeted them for degradation 12 . −Fs were known to dimerize and enter the nucleus [13][14][15][16] and the timing and control of this event was a regulated process 17,18 . Importantly, −Fs were known to bind and inhibit +TFs 10,16,19 . Several reports indicated that the joint activity of kinases and phosphatases (some of whose specific roles in the clock are functionally conserved across phyla, e.g., casein kinase 2 (CK2) [20][21][22] , casein kinase 1 (CK1) [23][24][25] and protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) 26,27 ) caused net progressive © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. *Corresponding author: Dunlap, J.C. (Jay.C.Dunlap@dartmouth.edu). Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyedi...