2012
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-397844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posttranslational regulation of self-renewal capacity: insights from proteome and phosphoproteome analyses of stem cell leukemia

Abstract: We recently generated 2 phenotypically similar Hoxa9؉Meis1 overexpressing acute myeloid leukemias that differ by their in vivo biologic behavior. The first leukemia, named FLA2, shows a high frequency of leukemia stem cells (LSCs; 1 in 1.4 cells), whereas the second, FLB1, is more typical with a frequency of LSCs in the range of 1 per several hundred cells. To gain insights into possible mechanisms that determine LSC selfrenewal, we profiled and compared the abundance of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins and ph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although model systems strongly implicate TF dysregulation in this disease, in patient material only a few common transcription factor abnormalities are known (e.g., PML-RARA, RUNX1-ETO, Inv16, CEPBA) and these are mainly associated with particular cytogenetic subsets of AML [36]. Therefore, large scale proteomic technologies are mainly used to quantify changes in protein abundance in in vivo or ES differentiation model systems [37][38][39]. However, the actual transcriptional environment in primary AML patient material characterized by the relative abundance of TF protein expression compared with normal blasts has not yet been described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although model systems strongly implicate TF dysregulation in this disease, in patient material only a few common transcription factor abnormalities are known (e.g., PML-RARA, RUNX1-ETO, Inv16, CEPBA) and these are mainly associated with particular cytogenetic subsets of AML [36]. Therefore, large scale proteomic technologies are mainly used to quantify changes in protein abundance in in vivo or ES differentiation model systems [37][38][39]. However, the actual transcriptional environment in primary AML patient material characterized by the relative abundance of TF protein expression compared with normal blasts has not yet been described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One milligram of cell lysates were reduced, alkylated, and digested as described above. After sample clean-up using solid phase extraction cartridges (HPE, Waters), phosphopeptides were enriched using TiO 2 chromatography (4446). Phosphopeptides were analyzed on an Orbitrap Velos Pro, using above LC and mass spectrometry settings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Label-free quantitative proteomics was used to profile protein abundance across sample sets, as reported previously (22,23). Briefly, Mascot peptide identifications were matched to ion intensity (MS peak intensity, minimum threshold: 10,000 counts) extracted from the aligned MS raw data files (tolerances set to m/z ϭ 15 ppm and retention time ϭ 1 min).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%