2002
DOI: 10.1300/j077v20n02_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posttraumatic Growth in Women with Breast Cancer and Their Husbands

Abstract: In the aftermath of a severely stressful event, in addition to reporting negative changes, people also report personal growth. The degree to which reports of posttraumatic growth by 41 women who survived breast cancer could be corroborated by their husbands was examined. Because the breast cancer experience is an equally stressful event for husbands and may present an opportunity for growth, the degree to which the husbands' reports of posttraumatic growth could be corroborated by their wives also was examined… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

23
136
8
18

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
23
136
8
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison with prior research does not suggest that they were more likely to experience posttraumatic growth than were other populations of cancer patients. For example, the average PTGI total score in the present study of 64.7 is very similar to the average scores of 64.1 reported for women with breast cancer who were also assessed an average of 24 months posttreatment (Cordova et al, 2001) and 60.2 reported for women with breast cancer who were assessed an average of 35 months posttreatment (Weiss, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Comparison with prior research does not suggest that they were more likely to experience posttraumatic growth than were other populations of cancer patients. For example, the average PTGI total score in the present study of 64.7 is very similar to the average scores of 64.1 reported for women with breast cancer who were also assessed an average of 24 months posttreatment (Cordova et al, 2001) and 60.2 reported for women with breast cancer who were assessed an average of 35 months posttreatment (Weiss, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, these findings are not consistent throughout literature, with some studies reporting social support to be a predictor of growth (Weiss, 2002), and others, such as the meta-analysis from Linley and Joseph that report significant relationships between satisfaction with social support, but not social support itself, which shows a greater need for more research in this area.…”
Section: Social Supportcontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…The subjective experience of the severity of the trauma shows an amplification of the relationships. Since these variables have been shown in previous studies to be correlates of PTG, although somewhat in an unclear manner (Helgeson et al, 2006;Weiss, 2002;Linley & Joseph, 2004;Wild & Paivio, 2003) the results of this study could be one way of showing why these results have been ambiguous. This study also looked at gender differences between the different types of trauma severity groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some people show negative decline and others report no change, many people report positive growth following adversity. This human capacity to identify benefits from crisis has already been reported in various populations including cancer survivors (Cordova, Cunningham, Carlson, & Andrykowski, 2001), people who experienced sexual assault (Frazier, Conlon, & Glaser, 2001) and bereavement (Currier, Mallot, Martinez, Sandy & Neimeyer, 2012), youth exposed to terror incidents (Laufer & Solomon, 2006), and even caregivers of cancer survivors (Weiss, 2002). Growth following stressors has been reported across many cultures (e.g., for Australians: Shakespeare-Finch & Coppoing, 2006; for Chinese : Ho, Chu, & Yiu, 2008; for Japanese : Taku, Calhoun, Tedeschi, Gil-Rivas, Kilmer, & Cann, 2007; for Latina immigrants: Berger & Weiss, 2006; for Malaysians: Schroevers & Teo, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%