2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posttraumatic Reconstruction of the Hand—A Retrospective Review of 87 Toe-to-Hand Transfers Compared With an Earlier Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept is well known but rarely reported in the literature with such lengthy follow‐up and detailed outcomes measures. Previous reports failed to include comprehensive outcome measures such as PROMIS subscales and EuroQol (Garagnani et al, ; Gu et al, ; Hierner & Berger, ; Kotkansalo et al, ; Kvernmo & Tsai, ; Lee et al, ; Tonkin et al, ; Tsubokawa et al, ; Venkatramani et al, ; Wallace & Wei, ; Zhao et al, ). Others utilized different outcome measures such as the Tamai (Kotkansalo et al, ; Venkatramani et al, ) scoring system, Sollerman (Kotkansalo et al, ) hand function test, Cold Intolerance Severity Score (Gu et al, ), or the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire (Garagnani et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This concept is well known but rarely reported in the literature with such lengthy follow‐up and detailed outcomes measures. Previous reports failed to include comprehensive outcome measures such as PROMIS subscales and EuroQol (Garagnani et al, ; Gu et al, ; Hierner & Berger, ; Kotkansalo et al, ; Kvernmo & Tsai, ; Lee et al, ; Tonkin et al, ; Tsubokawa et al, ; Venkatramani et al, ; Wallace & Wei, ; Zhao et al, ). Others utilized different outcome measures such as the Tamai (Kotkansalo et al, ; Venkatramani et al, ) scoring system, Sollerman (Kotkansalo et al, ) hand function test, Cold Intolerance Severity Score (Gu et al, ), or the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire (Garagnani et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others utilized different outcome measures such as the Tamai (Kotkansalo et al, ; Venkatramani et al, ) scoring system, Sollerman (Kotkansalo et al, ) hand function test, Cold Intolerance Severity Score (Gu et al, ), or the Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire (Garagnani et al, ). Many failed to include foot outcomes altogether (Gu et al, ; Hierner & Berger, ; Kotkansalo et al, ; Kvernmo & Tsai, ; Lee et al, ; Tonkin et al, ; Tsubokawa et al, ; Venkatramani et al, ; Wallace & Wei, ; Zhao et al, ). Some used visual analog scale scores to assess patient satisfaction with flap or toe appearance (Gu et al, ; Kotkansalo et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Free toe transfer has become a preferred method of thumb and finger reconstruction and generally yields good functional results [1,10,23,24]. While initially secondary transfer was commonly performed, study has shown that primary transfer results in comparable outcomes and reduces the need for a second surgery [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These distinct advantages not only make toe-tohand transfer an acceptable approach, but also make it the method of choice for digit reconstruction. [3][4][5] As compared with thumb, finger reconstruction using toe transplantation was not well accepted and somewhat controversial for 2 reasons 6-8 : (1) the minimal functional deficit and the possibility of functional compensation in some cases make sacrificing a toe for finger reconstruction appear unjustifiable; (2) it is technically challenging to achieve a satisfactory reconstruction of a finger with an aesthetic appearance and adequate function at the same time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%