“…As with the item-level analyses, the samples were very diverse, and the sample sizes varied from 71 [52] to 1289 [17], with a mean of 288.70. Twelve studies [17,18,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] reported that the turning to religion sub-scale loaded to a factor with at least one other sub-scale, three studies [62][63][64] reported that the turning to religion sub-scale formed its own separate factor, and five studies [21,[65][66][67][68] reported that the religion sub-scale did not have a sufficiently high loading with any other factor. As with the item-level analyses (Table 1), PCA was the most frequently used technique, with 9 of the 20 studies [18,[52][53][54]56,57,62,64,66] explicitly stating this method.…”