2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.08.531710
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postural and muscular effects of upper-limb movements on voicing

Abstract: Voice production can be a whole-body affair: Upper limb movements physically impact the voice in steady-state vocalization, speaking, and singing. This is supposedly due to biomechanical impulses on the chest-wall, affecting subglottal pressure. Unveiling such biomechanics is important, as humans gesture with their hands in a synchronized way with speaking. Here we assess biomechanical interactions between arm movements and the voice, by measurement of key (respiratory-related) muscles with electromyography (E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We should further highlight that our hypothesized mechanism of vocal-motor interaction is on the level of biomechanics (kinetics) suggesting that mechanical loading on the thorax increases eggressive flow for vocalization (raising amplitude), but our analysis is on the level of movement (kinematics). Accordingly more work is needed on the level of biomechanics too 5,10,30,44 , evaluating how locomotion might affect the surrounding myofascial-skeletal structure around the respiratory system and thereby far-from-equilibrium subglottal pressures needed for vocalizing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should further highlight that our hypothesized mechanism of vocal-motor interaction is on the level of biomechanics (kinetics) suggesting that mechanical loading on the thorax increases eggressive flow for vocalization (raising amplitude), but our analysis is on the level of movement (kinematics). Accordingly more work is needed on the level of biomechanics too 5,10,30,44 , evaluating how locomotion might affect the surrounding myofascial-skeletal structure around the respiratory system and thereby far-from-equilibrium subglottal pressures needed for vocalizing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research into gesture-speech physics has conducted experiments and synthesized findings from neural processes, biomechanics and social interaction to develop a 'multilevel multimodal approach' to gesture and prosody (Pouw et al, 2021;cf. Pouw, de Jonge-Hoekstra, et al, 2020a;Pouw, Harrison, et al, 2020b, Pouw & Fuchs, 2022, Pouw et al, 2024. Of interest here is the 'gesture-speech biomechanics thesis', which stems from empirical evidence that 'when an upper-limb segment with a certain mass (or multiple segments with a certain combined mass) sufficiently accelerates or decelerates, it yields physical impulses on the musculoskeletal system, the cascading mechanical effects of which will constraining respiratory-vocal activity' (Pouw & Fuchs, 2022, p. 4).…”
Section: Gesture-speech Biomechanics and Vocal-entangled Gestures Ass...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research into 'vocal-entangled gesture', on the other hand, reveals correlations at scales and speeds that are happening 'deeper' and/or at 'higher frequency' and which have their own vitality and animacy. Such correlations include those within the bio-anatomy of our respiratory-motor systems discovered experimentally with various muscle, posture, motion and audiosensing technologies (Pouw et al, 2024;Pouw & Fuchs, 2022). When compared to the neat partitioning of components or activities into audio-oral and visualgestural modes from where multimodal treatments of speech and gesture often set out (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, despite the gesture-speech physics theory clearly assuming a respiratory effect of beat-like upper-limb movements, no measurements have been taken to directly assess respiratory modulation. In this exploratory study, we thus analyze the data of participants producing voiceless expirations that were recorded along with and under the same experimental conditions as voicing [16,19]. We assess whether different types of arm movement affect expiration as compared to a passive no movement condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%