2013 13th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/humanoids.2013.7029988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postural modes and control for dexterous mobile manipulation: the UMass uBot concept

Abstract: Abstract-We present the UMass uBot concept for dexterous mobile manipulation. The uBot concept is built around Bernstein's definition of dexterity-"the ability to solve a motor problem correctly, quickly, rationally, and resourcefully" [1]. We contend that dexterity in robotic platforms cannot arise from control alone and can only be achieved when the entire design of the robot affords resourceful behavior. uBot-6 is the latest robot in the uBot series whose design affords several postural configurations and m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, optimal controllers described by regulators like linear quadratic regulators (LQRs) and its variants fall into this categorization as well. In fact, dynamically balancing robots like the uBot platforms Kuindersma et al (2009); Ruiken et al (2013), implement a variant of LQR. To reiterate the notion of learning abstractions, we suggest strongly that rather than learning a balancing policy from scratch, perhaps a better direction is to consider this closed-loop controller as a skill and employing learning architectures at the skill level of abstraction.…”
Section: Activating Motion Primitivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, optimal controllers described by regulators like linear quadratic regulators (LQRs) and its variants fall into this categorization as well. In fact, dynamically balancing robots like the uBot platforms Kuindersma et al (2009); Ruiken et al (2013), implement a variant of LQR. To reiterate the notion of learning abstractions, we suggest strongly that rather than learning a balancing policy from scratch, perhaps a better direction is to consider this closed-loop controller as a skill and employing learning architectures at the skill level of abstraction.…”
Section: Activating Motion Primitivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments are done on a dynamic simulation of the uBot-6 platform, a 13 DOF, toddler-sized, dynamically balancing, mobile manipulator [34] equipped with an Asus Xtion Pro Live RGB-D camera (shown in Figure 2) and two ATI Mini45 Force/Torque sensors one in each hand (not shown in figure). Control actions are executed by the robot to establish new sensor geometries and reveal new aspects.…”
Section: A Robot Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…uBot-6 can transition between its postural modes by following the paths in the postural transition graph (Figure 3). The postural modes, controllers, and costs of postural transitions are described in detail in (Kuindersma et al 2009) and (Ruiken, Lanighan, and Grupen 2013). Compared to locomotion, transitions from one mode to another are relatively costly-in fact, they are an order of magnitude more expensive in terms of time and energy.…”
Section: Robot Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows the required time for driving in various postural modes and transitions between postural modes. Experiments use nominal velocities for driving actions though more detailed cost models and velocity constraints can be found in (Ruiken, Lanighan, and Grupen 2013). Prone scooting allows higher maximum drive velocities than balancing.…”
Section: Cost Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%