Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Introduction:The spine related diseases have been increasing sharply and causing serious problems for public health. Having a postural assessment with one of the important factors in the prevention and/or treatment of these problems. Objectives: To determine which methods of spinal postural assessment has been used in studies and national journals published recently. Methods: This study is a systematic review, which followed the recommendations (PRISMA) "Transparent report of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis." The search data Began with the choice of key terms and synonyms following the Health Sciences Descriptors DeSC and MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Due to achieve the main objective of the research, we selected only studies of national authors and journals published between the year 2013 to Feb/2014, yet fitting, made any kind of spinal postural assessment. Conducted a descriptive statistical checking the frequency percentages by software (IBM ® SPSS ® Statistic, vs 21, New York/USA 2012. Results: 25 studies were included, and the methods of evaluation were: photogrammetry (36.7%, n =11); Posturógrafo (16.7%, n=5); X-Ray (10%, n=3); Postural Visual Evalution (23.3%, n=7) Goniometry (3.3%, n=1). Conclusions: it is concluded between national studies photogrammetry is the postural assessment methods most used today. Keywords: Posture; Spinal Diseases; Measurement Equipment. ResumoIntrodução: As doenças relacionadas à coluna vertebral vêm crescendo abruptamente e gerando sérios problemas para saúde pública. Tendo a avaliação postural com um dos fatores importante na prevenção e/ou tratamento desses problemas. Objetivos: verificar quais métodos de avaliação postural da coluna vertebral vem sendo usados nos estudos e periódicos nacionais publicados recentemente. Métodos: Este é estudo de revisão sistemática, que seguiu as recomendações (PRISMA) "Transparent report of Systematic Reviews and Meta-análise". A busca de dados inciou-se com a escolha dos termos chaves e sinônimos seguindo os Descritores em Ciências da Saúde (DESC), e MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Em virtude de atingir o objetivo principal da pesquisa, selecionaram-se apenas estudos de autores e periódicos nacionais publicados entre o ano de 2013 a Fev/2014, cabendo ainda, realizado qualquer tipo de avaliação postural da coluna vertebral. Realizou uma estatística descritiva verificando a frequência em porcentagens através do software (IBM® SPSS® Statistic, vs 21, Nova York/EUA, 2012. Resultados: Foram contemplados 25 estudos, e os métodos de avaliação encontrados foram: fotogrametria (36,7%, n=11); Avaliação Postural Visual (23,3%, n=7); Posturógrafo (16,7%, n=5); Raio-X (10%, n=3); Goniometria (3,3%, n=1). Conclusão: Conclui-se entre os estudos nacionais a fotogrametria é o métodos de avaliação postural mais utilizado atualmente. Palavras-Chave: Postura; Doenças da Coluna Vertebral; Equipamentos de Medição.
Introduction:The spine related diseases have been increasing sharply and causing serious problems for public health. Having a postural assessment with one of the important factors in the prevention and/or treatment of these problems. Objectives: To determine which methods of spinal postural assessment has been used in studies and national journals published recently. Methods: This study is a systematic review, which followed the recommendations (PRISMA) "Transparent report of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis." The search data Began with the choice of key terms and synonyms following the Health Sciences Descriptors DeSC and MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Due to achieve the main objective of the research, we selected only studies of national authors and journals published between the year 2013 to Feb/2014, yet fitting, made any kind of spinal postural assessment. Conducted a descriptive statistical checking the frequency percentages by software (IBM ® SPSS ® Statistic, vs 21, New York/USA 2012. Results: 25 studies were included, and the methods of evaluation were: photogrammetry (36.7%, n =11); Posturógrafo (16.7%, n=5); X-Ray (10%, n=3); Postural Visual Evalution (23.3%, n=7) Goniometry (3.3%, n=1). Conclusions: it is concluded between national studies photogrammetry is the postural assessment methods most used today. Keywords: Posture; Spinal Diseases; Measurement Equipment. ResumoIntrodução: As doenças relacionadas à coluna vertebral vêm crescendo abruptamente e gerando sérios problemas para saúde pública. Tendo a avaliação postural com um dos fatores importante na prevenção e/ou tratamento desses problemas. Objetivos: verificar quais métodos de avaliação postural da coluna vertebral vem sendo usados nos estudos e periódicos nacionais publicados recentemente. Métodos: Este é estudo de revisão sistemática, que seguiu as recomendações (PRISMA) "Transparent report of Systematic Reviews and Meta-análise". A busca de dados inciou-se com a escolha dos termos chaves e sinônimos seguindo os Descritores em Ciências da Saúde (DESC), e MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Em virtude de atingir o objetivo principal da pesquisa, selecionaram-se apenas estudos de autores e periódicos nacionais publicados entre o ano de 2013 a Fev/2014, cabendo ainda, realizado qualquer tipo de avaliação postural da coluna vertebral. Realizou uma estatística descritiva verificando a frequência em porcentagens através do software (IBM® SPSS® Statistic, vs 21, Nova York/EUA, 2012. Resultados: Foram contemplados 25 estudos, e os métodos de avaliação encontrados foram: fotogrametria (36,7%, n=11); Avaliação Postural Visual (23,3%, n=7); Posturógrafo (16,7%, n=5); Raio-X (10%, n=3); Goniometria (3,3%, n=1). Conclusão: Conclui-se entre os estudos nacionais a fotogrametria é o métodos de avaliação postural mais utilizado atualmente. Palavras-Chave: Postura; Doenças da Coluna Vertebral; Equipamentos de Medição.
Introduction: Nowadays, postural problems are widely discussed concerns because they involve quality of life and interfere with the functional aspects of individuals. To do this, muscle stretching exercise is suggested as useful in treating postural deviations. Objective: To investigate the effect of muscle stretching on body posture and analyze aspects of prescription and evaluation methods in order to relate the proposed training and results. Method: This systematic review was previously registered and accepted in International Registry Of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, id: CRD42013005280), and described according to the recommendations of the PRISMA. The search data began with the choice of key terms and their synonyms, according to the Words of Heath (DeSC) and MeSH. After, seeking material was performed on the major databases of scientific information (SciELO; PEDro, PubMed and Google Scholar). The studies that met the eligibility criteria underwent an evaluation as to their methodological quality based on the Brazilian - Portuguese version of the PEDro scale. Results: seven scorers, clinical trials, found methodologically, following Pedro scale, which showed little evidence about the topic, which contain significant limitations and/or low methodological quality. Conclusion: There is little evidence on the effectiveness of the intervention with exercise stretching in correcting postural deviations, making it difficult to reach consensus or conclusions.
The postural assessment method most frequently used among Brazilian studies hasbeen photogrammetry. Objective: To verify that the software most used in photogrammetry currently in experimental studies published in Brazilian journals. A systematic review, following the PRISMA recommendations. The key terms were chosen through Descriptors Health (DeCS) and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), finding in Portuguese: Photogrammetry; software; posture; Spinal Diseases; Measurement Equipment, and the English language: Photogrammetry; software; posture; Spinal Diseases; Measurement Equipment. The terms were inserted into the bases of national and international data: SciELO; PUBMED, and the search site Google Scholar (G.S). Were included for analysis 11 articles, which had five different types of software on their assessments, and the software was found more SAPO® (n=6), followed by Corel Draw® (n=2), Proturograma® (n=1) APADIO (n=1) and APAS (n=1). We conclude that the more the software used (SAPO®) ".
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.