2016
DOI: 10.17159/2078-516x/2016/v28i3a438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posture and isokinetic shoulder strength in female water polo players

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature of the sport being played in the water, makes 'field' measurement logistically challenging and, ultimately, ending in loss of specificity due to the testing requirements (e.g., fixation requirements of the players). Aginsky et al (Aginsky, 2016) examined the concentric: concentric and eccentric: eccentric ratios for dominant and non-dominant arms, and reported concentric: concentric ratio values for both sides lower than the 0.66-0.75 ratio reported earlier, while the eccentric: eccentric ratio was within that range for both sides (Aginsky, 2016). The difference in results could be attributed to the difference in testing mode (isokinetic v isometric) and speed (60°/s v static).…”
Section: Discussion and Implicationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The nature of the sport being played in the water, makes 'field' measurement logistically challenging and, ultimately, ending in loss of specificity due to the testing requirements (e.g., fixation requirements of the players). Aginsky et al (Aginsky, 2016) examined the concentric: concentric and eccentric: eccentric ratios for dominant and non-dominant arms, and reported concentric: concentric ratio values for both sides lower than the 0.66-0.75 ratio reported earlier, while the eccentric: eccentric ratio was within that range for both sides (Aginsky, 2016). The difference in results could be attributed to the difference in testing mode (isokinetic v isometric) and speed (60°/s v static).…”
Section: Discussion and Implicationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…sports. Isokinetic assessment is commonly used (Aginsky, 2016;Hams et al, 2019;McMaster et al, 1991) for that purpose, and a recommendation of external to internal rotation ratio between 0.66 and 0.75 (Ellenbecker & Davies, 2000) has been suggested for a 'healthy' shoulder, while water-polo-specific suggestions report a much wider range of 1.0.50 (Miller et al, 2018). Nonetheless, the measurement mode (e.g., concentric: concentric or concentric: eccentric) and the isokinetic speed (e.g., 60°/s or 300°/s) and their combination, will impact on the result and the test's sensitivity to detect imbalances (De Castro et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussion and Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations