2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2012.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posture-invariant statistical shape analysis using Laplace operator

Abstract: Statistical shape analysis is a tool that allows to quantify the shape variability of a population of shapes. Traditional tools to perform statistical shape analysis compute variations that reflect both shape and posture changes simultaneously. In many applications, such as ergonomic design applications, we are only interested in shape variations. With traditional tools, it is not straightforward to separate shape and posture variations. To overcome this problem, we propose an approach to perform statistical s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If our goal is to understand the variability of human shapes, we must then factor out the variability due to pose variations among the subjects. Various approaches have been tried towards this end, including PCA in a Riemannian symmetric space [Fletcher et al 2004], multivariate tensor-based morphometry using holomorphic forms [Wang et al 2010], tensor ICA [Vasilescu and Terzopoulos 2007], the use of Laplace coordinates for points [Wuhrer et al 2012], and others [Nain et al 2007]. Only recently has an approach been proposed in these communities for comparing shapes intrinsically [Lai et al 2010] using a spectral L 2 distance, but the approach suffers from the usual sign ambiguities (or more generally rotations within an eigenspace) of the eigenfunctions in spectral embeddings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If our goal is to understand the variability of human shapes, we must then factor out the variability due to pose variations among the subjects. Various approaches have been tried towards this end, including PCA in a Riemannian symmetric space [Fletcher et al 2004], multivariate tensor-based morphometry using holomorphic forms [Wang et al 2010], tensor ICA [Vasilescu and Terzopoulos 2007], the use of Laplace coordinates for points [Wuhrer et al 2012], and others [Nain et al 2007]. Only recently has an approach been proposed in these communities for comparing shapes intrinsically [Lai et al 2010] using a spectral L 2 distance, but the approach suffers from the usual sign ambiguities (or more generally rotations within an eigenspace) of the eigenfunctions in spectral embeddings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this approach leads to better shape spaces, it is difficult to directly apply this approach to the S-SCAPE spaces learned using Cartesian coordinates. We therefore compute a posture-normalized version of each fitted mesh M i in the following way: we start with a mean shape M computed over all M i and use [38] to optimize the localized Laplacian coordinates of M to be as close as possible to M i . This leads to fittings that have the body shape of M i in the common normalized posture of M.…”
Section: Posture Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ours ours+ WSX Shown are eigenvectors of the S-SCAPE space [18] (row 1) and the S-SCAPE spaces trained using our pre-processed data without (row 2) and with posture normalization using WSX [38] (row 3) and NH [21] (row 4).…”
Section: S-scape [18]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, in order to specify a new pose given a specific shape, linear regression is required to learn how a model deforms given a set of joint angles. Wuhrer et al [16] proposed an alternative rigid-invariant surface encoding by expressing the Laplacian coordinates of the surface with respect to local frames of reference. The constructed PCA space jointly models shape and non-rigid pose deformations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%