Fasting and refeeding occur naturally in predators but this is largely ignored when dealing with farmed fish. Therefore, the effects of 3-week fasting and re-alimentation (2.5% of the individual body mass) were investigated using two genetically selected populations (F2 generation) of 250 g juvenile sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). Blood osmolarity, gill and intestinal morphology and expression of the sodium pump (Na + , K +-ATPase, NKA) were studied on two phenotypes showing different degrees of body mass loss during food deprivation: one group losing body mass rapidly during fasting (F +) and the other one limiting body mass loss during the same period (F-). Blood osmotic pressure significantly decreases due to re-alimentation in both groups, but this is compensated in the F + group. In this group, gill ionocytes are smaller and less numerous, but a significantly higher NKA gene expression is noted in the gills in comparison to the F-individuals 48 and 72 h after re-alimentation, and also in the posterior intestine 72 h after re-alimentation. This most probably occurs to compensate for a higher salt intake during nutrient absorption in comparison to the F-group. Furthermore, refed F-fish absorb more lipids along the proximal anterior intestine, and take longer to digest than the F + group, and show enterocyte vacuolization in the posterior intestine. Therefore, the two selected populations have different postprandial digestive strategies: the F-fish optimize feed efficiency first at the cost of optimal hydromineral adjustment, while the F + group invests in osmoregulatory performance at the expense of digestive physiology. Please note that this is an author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available on the publisher Web site. Statement of relevance Our paper is highly relevant to the general field of commercial aquaculture. There is an increasing number of research articles dealing with fasting and refeeding in commercial fish and how to improve fish nutrition based on these physiological data and genetic selection. Highlights ► This study focused on differences observed in the gills and intestine of two selected populations with contrasting tolerance to fasting. ► The two phenotypes show different degrees of body mass loss during food deprivation: one group losing body mass rapidly during fasting (F +) and the other one limits body mass loss during the same period (F-). ► During feeding, these two phenotypes have different physiological optimization / prioritization and energetic benefits. ► We evidence that the fast feeders (F +) are also the bad fasters.