The
adsorption of two zwitterionic surfactants, dodecyldimethylammonium
propanesulfonate (C12PS) and dodecyldimethylammonium carboxybetaine
(C12CB), and of their mixtures with the cationic dodecyltrimethylammonium
bromide (C12TAB) and the anionic sodium dodecylsulfate
(SDS) at the silica–water interface has been studied by neutron
reflection (NR). The total adsorption, the composition of the adsorbed
layer, and some structural information have been obtained over a range
of concentrations from below the critical micelle concentration (CMC)
to about 30× the mixed CMC. The adsorption behavior has been
considered in relation to the previously measured micellar equilibrium
of these mixtures in their bulk solutions and their adsorption at
the air–water interface. C12CB adsorbs cooperatively
close to its CMC to form an almost complete bilayer on its own, whereas
C12PS adsorbs more weakly in a fragmented bilayer structure.
Although SDS does not normally adsorb at the silica–water interface,
SDS adsorbs strongly and cooperatively with C12PS at fractional
SDS compositions up to about 0.5. This cooperativity is lost when
the adsorbed fraction of SDS rises above about 0.5. At this point,
adsorption drops sharply, creating an unusual maximum in the variation
of adsorption with a total concentration above the mixed CMC. Neither
the increase in cooperativity nor the subsequent decline in adsorption
results directly from variations of the independently determined monomer
concentrations in the bulk solution. The adsorption maximum is predominantly
the effect of strong cooperative interaction, possibly accompanied
by partial segregation of SDS within the layer, followed by charge
repulsion from the surface. Although the solution aggregation and
adsorption at the A–W interface are similar for SDS with C12CB, the addition of SDS to C12CB at the silica–water
interface promotes the opposite behavior to that of SDS with C12PS, and SDS simply disrupts the cooperative binding of C12CB. Unlike SDS, the cationic surfactant C12TAB
adsorbs on silica. It therefore coadsorbs at the SiO2–W
interface with either C12CB or C12PS. However,
in neither case is there any pronounced cooperativity and, even though
the presence of C12TAB might be expected to favor adsorption,
the adsorption is generally unexpectedly low.