1993
DOI: 10.1097/00005344-199302000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potassium Channel Blockade of Atrial Negative Inotropic Responses to P1Purinoceptor and Muscarinic Receptor Agonists and to Cromakalim

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings rule out the involvement of voltage-dependent K v cannels on the inhibitory effects of A 1 and M 2 agonists and confirm data from interaction studies between 4-AP (0.3–3 mM) and R-PIA in the guinea-pig using spontaneously beating and electrically-driven atria (De Biasi et al, 1989 ). Concerning the lack of effect of glibenclamide in antagonizing the responses to M 2 and A 1 receptor agonists in rat atria, our results agree with previous reports in the guinea-pig indicating that cardiodepression by these agents are not operated by ATP-sensitive K ATP /K IR 6 channels (Urquhart et al, 1993 ; Ford and Broadley, 1999 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings rule out the involvement of voltage-dependent K v cannels on the inhibitory effects of A 1 and M 2 agonists and confirm data from interaction studies between 4-AP (0.3–3 mM) and R-PIA in the guinea-pig using spontaneously beating and electrically-driven atria (De Biasi et al, 1989 ). Concerning the lack of effect of glibenclamide in antagonizing the responses to M 2 and A 1 receptor agonists in rat atria, our results agree with previous reports in the guinea-pig indicating that cardiodepression by these agents are not operated by ATP-sensitive K ATP /K IR 6 channels (Urquhart et al, 1993 ; Ford and Broadley, 1999 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Due to different expression levels of A 1 and M 2 receptors, the maximal GIRK/K IR 3.1∕3.4 current that can be activated by endogenous adenosine is smaller than the current triggered by cholinergic agonists (Kurachi et al, 1986 ). Activation of GIRK/K IR 3.1/3.4 currents causes a reduction in the action potential duration, thereby decreasing the time available for Ca 2+ influx through Ca v 1 (L-type) channels and, hence, heart rate and the force of muscle contraction in atrial myocardium (Urquhart et al, 1993 ; Belardinelli et al, 1995 ; Neumann et al, 1999 ). Negative inotropy may, however, be partially compensated by modulation of multiple downstream targets of G proteins, which may include Ca 2+ influx through Ca v 1 (L-type) channels (Wang et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This receptor was xanthine sensitive, not coupled to adenylyl cyclase and produced effects by modulating calcium entry into cells ( Ribeiro & Sebastiao, 1986 ). Both K + efflux ( Belardinelli & Isenberg, 1983 ; Cerbai et al ., 1988 ; Visentin et al ., 1990 ; Urquhart et al ., 1991 ; 1993 ) and closure of L‐type calcium channels ( DeBiasi et al ., 1989 ; Fassina et al ., 1991 ; Jahnel et al ., 1992 ) have been implicated in the negative inotropic effects of adenosine analogues in the guinea‐pig left atria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%