2018
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201870204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potassium‐Ion Batteries: Understanding of the Ultrastable K‐Ion Storage of Carbonaceous Anode (Adv. Funct. Mater. 29/2018)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further clarify the electrochemical kinetics of the NC@CoP/NC electrode, the pseudocapacitive contribution was probed by carrying out CV scans at sweep rates ranging from 0.1 to 1.2 mV s −1 (Figure S14, Supporting Information). According to the equation i = av b ( i is the current, v is the scan rate, a and b are constants), the b value obtained from peaks of anodic and cathodic current are 0.73 and 0.71, respectively (Figure S15, Supporting Information), indicative of combined pseudocapacitive and diffusion‐controlled processes . The outstanding rate capability and cycling stability of the NC@CoP/NC in terms of potassium‐ion storage (Table S1, Supporting Information) could be ascribed to the rational design of MOF‐derived nanostructure, affording synergistic advantages from the nitrogen‐doped carbon confined CoP polyhedrons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further clarify the electrochemical kinetics of the NC@CoP/NC electrode, the pseudocapacitive contribution was probed by carrying out CV scans at sweep rates ranging from 0.1 to 1.2 mV s −1 (Figure S14, Supporting Information). According to the equation i = av b ( i is the current, v is the scan rate, a and b are constants), the b value obtained from peaks of anodic and cathodic current are 0.73 and 0.71, respectively (Figure S15, Supporting Information), indicative of combined pseudocapacitive and diffusion‐controlled processes . The outstanding rate capability and cycling stability of the NC@CoP/NC in terms of potassium‐ion storage (Table S1, Supporting Information) could be ascribed to the rational design of MOF‐derived nanostructure, affording synergistic advantages from the nitrogen‐doped carbon confined CoP polyhedrons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, the adsorption of K + onto the surface defects/functional groups or nanovoids of carbon is a surface‐induced capacitive process, which can favor fast ion diffusion and sustain excellent structure stability, promoting high rate and long cycling performance. [ 111 ] The capacitive contribution may originate from the double‐layer capacitance/pseudocapacitance behavior mainly occurring on the active surface, which can be enhanced by the increment of SSA and doping of heteroatoms, [ 116 ] without any damage to the electrode. For example, N/O doped macro/meso/microporous hard carbon microspheres (SSA = 1030 m 2 g −1 ) exhibited a capacitance‐dominant K‐ion storage.…”
Section: Structural Design Of Nanoporous Carbons For Versatile Applicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 117 ] Envelope‐like N‐doped carbon nanosheets (SSA = 674 m 2 g −1 ) with a pore size centering at 13.8 nm was evidenced to present high pseudocapacitance as KIB anode, delivering an initial reversible capacity of 367 mAh g −1 at 50 mA g −1 with ultrastable cyclic performance. [ 116 ]…”
Section: Structural Design Of Nanoporous Carbons For Versatile Applicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a variety of potential electrode materials, including carbon materials (graphite, porous carbon, graphene, and carbon nanotubes) and metal‐based compounds, have been explored for PIB anodes . However, the reversible capacity and the cycling stability of most materials are still unsatisfactory to meet the requirements of high energy density storage devices . Particularly, the intrinsic larger ionic radius of K + (1.38 Å), in comparison to Li + (0.76 Å), causes the high mechanical stress/strain of host electrodes and the sluggish diffusion rate during K‐ion intercalation/de‐intercalation …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%