1957
DOI: 10.1038/180866b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potato Blight and Leaf-Roll Virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in contrast to Richardson & Doling (1957) that rates of invasion by P. infestans were identieal, suggesting that the only effects which leaf-roll virus intection has on blight may result from distorted leaves altering the microclimate. Infection by potato viruses X and Y has been reported to reduce the susceptibility of leaves to blight (Muller & Munro, 1951), possibly by inhibiting the liberation and germination of zoospores and reducing the aggressiveness ofthe fungus (Kalra et al.…”
Section: Other Effects Of the Aerial Environmentmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in contrast to Richardson & Doling (1957) that rates of invasion by P. infestans were identieal, suggesting that the only effects which leaf-roll virus intection has on blight may result from distorted leaves altering the microclimate. Infection by potato viruses X and Y has been reported to reduce the susceptibility of leaves to blight (Muller & Munro, 1951), possibly by inhibiting the liberation and germination of zoospores and reducing the aggressiveness ofthe fungus (Kalra et al.…”
Section: Other Effects Of the Aerial Environmentmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Alpha, was much more resistant to blight in New York than it ,, ^ ,,, , was in Toluca. Differences found between the '"•"' '"f'"'"" ^"^ blight susceptibility sites may have been due to differences in the aerial Richardson & Doling (1957) attributed the environment. Over 30 years ago, Umaerus (1959) greater bhght susceptibility of whole leaves considered that field resistance to foliage blight infected with potato leaf-roll virus to the fact that could be reduced by shortening the photoperiod the curled surfaces remained wet for longer than and decreasing the light intensity.…”
Section: Other Effects Of the Aerial Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In potato, the available literature shows somewhat diverging results on disease severity in multiple versus single infections. Indeed, Richardson and Doling (1957) showed an increased incidence and severity of late blight, caused by the oomycete Phytophthora infestans , on tubers of plants co‐infected by potato leaf roll virus (PLRV) compared to neighbouring virus‐free plants. A similar observation was made in potato cultivars upon co‐infection with potato virus X (Dowley, 1973) or with potato virus S (Lin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar observation was made in potato cultivars upon co‐infection with potato virus X (Dowley, 1973) or with potato virus S (Lin et al, 2014). However, Richardson and Doling (1957) also showed that, under laboratory conditions, potato leaflets infected with PLRV are significantly less susceptible to infection by P . infestans , and that the expansion of late blight symptoms was also slower in virus‐infected than in virus‐free leaflets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the damage caused by two concurrently infecting pathogens is similar to the sum of damages caused by the pathogens attacking the host separately, the effect is additive; if the damage is less, there is a negative interaction; if it is greater, a positive interaction. Studies on interactions between systemic viruses and fungal diseases show that viral pre‐infection may have either an additive effect (Damsteegt et al ., 1993), or a positive (Richardson & Doling, 1957), or negative (Potter, 1982; Omar et al ., 1986; Zaiter et al ., 1990) interaction with fungal pathogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%