“…In this analysis, the mayor variance was registered for environments with value of 68.84**, it means that environments are different and important in the behaviour of varietal crosses; Besides, the coefficient of variation registered was of 13.44%, value relatively low, that suggest that the results of these experiments are reliables (Reyes, 1990) The yield of varietal hybrids across the 10 environments identified the best ones at 0.01 of probability; These ones were: SINT2BxVS536, SINT4BxVS536, SINT4BxSINT2B, SINT5Bx VS-536, SINT5BxVS537C, SINT1BQxVS-536 and SINT3BxSINT1BQ, with grain yield from 6.39 to 6.96 t ha -1 , statistically similar to the commercial hybrid H-520, the most used in the southeast of México (Sierra et al, 2019) Table 2 In the heterosis for the best varietal hybrids with respect to the best parent there were found values from 4.85 to 17.70%; The highest percentages of Heterosis were gotten for SINT2BxVS536 (17.70%), SINT4BxVS-536 (15.80%), SINT4B xSINT2B (10.78%), V537CxVS536 (11.21%). These Heterosis values suggests genetic divergence between the parental varieties (Reyes, 1985;Córdova et al, 2007;Sierra et al, 2004;Palemón et al, 2012;Velasco et al, 2019) (Figure 3). The best varietal hybrids were statistically similar to H-520, commercial hybrid used as check, and is the most used in the southeast of México; Besides these varietal hybrids take the advantage of maintaining only two parents, which are open pollinating maize varieties with greater yield, reliability, and easier for seed production (Sierra et al, 2018;Sierra et al, 2016;Gómez et al, 2017;López et al, 2021;Ramírez et al, 2019;Tadeo et al, 2021).…”