Potensi Sengketa Kontrak Konsultan Pengawas Akibat Perpanjangan Waktu Kontraktor pada Proyek Pemerintah Daerah Dki Jakarta Berdasarkan Fidic White Book

Abstract


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The purpose of this study is the identification of factors that result in supervisory consultants not being extended and not paid. This type of research is a combined study with a sequential form. Where quantitative is based on the philosophy of positivism which emphasizes objective phenomena and is studied qualitatively. A qualitative approach is used to examine the project, several techniques are used to collect data suitable for analysis. The results of the study stated that 7 dominant clauses caused the contractor's claim in the FIDIC Red Book, namely: 1) 8.4 Extension of Completion Time; 11.8 Investigation by the Contractor; 3) 17.1 Indemnification; 3) 7.4 Testing; 4) 8.9 Consequences of Termination; 5) 14.8 Late Payment; and 7) 4.12 Unforeseeable Physical Condition. In conclusion, all respondents the first largest RII value is X.3.4 Article in the Contract "The supervisory consultant contract document on the general terms of the article on the extension of implementation time is not in line with that stated in the SPMK, this has the potential to become a dispute". Then the second largest RII value is X.3.5 Article In the Contract "The submission of the final report of the supervisory consultant must be based on the weight of the contractor's implementation work 100%".
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Fidic White Book; Contractor; Government Projects