2007
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200636743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potent T cell agonism mediated by a very rapid TCR/pMHC interaction

Abstract: The interaction between T cell receptors (TCR) and peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) antigens can lead to varying degrees of agonism (T cell activation), or antagonism. The P14 TCR recognises the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV)- interactions. The most striking feature of these data is that a very short half-life does not preclude the ability of a TCR/pMHC interaction to induce antiviral immunity, autoimmune disease and tumour rejection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b and Table II). The binding affinity of P14 TCR to gp33/D b is within normal range for other TCR-pMHC I interactions reported (1,46), but slightly lower than the previous report (2.3 M) (44).…”
Section: The P14 Tcr-gp33/d B Interaction Features Low Binding Affinisupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2b and Table II). The binding affinity of P14 TCR to gp33/D b is within normal range for other TCR-pMHC I interactions reported (1,46), but slightly lower than the previous report (2.3 M) (44).…”
Section: The P14 Tcr-gp33/d B Interaction Features Low Binding Affinisupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A similar correlation of affinity activity was implied by Holler and Kranz (25) using transfected hybridomas, but a sigmoidal curve was not seen in their system. In addition to cytolysis and cytokine production, T cell proliferation was recently reported to correlate to affinity (leaving out those peptides that do not stabilize MHC well) also using P14 TCR (44). Because the binding of P14 TCR and cognate pMHCs is very fast, to make sure that binding kinetics are accurate, we also tried a few other ways to fit the data, e.g., to fit just the rapid dissociation phase (the first 5 s) because slow dissociation phase is more affected by nonspecific binding, to fit without the highest concentrations in which aggregates might exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of the binding kinetics for these two complexes indicates that these exceptionally low affinities were the result of a combination of faster k off values ($0.3 s À1 ) and slower k on values ($700 M À1 .s À1 ) ( Figure 4E, Table 3). The k off values were at the fast end of the range previously reported for syngeneic agonist TCR-peptide-MHC interactions (Boulter et al, 2007;van der Merwe and Davis, 2003) (0.02 < k off < 0.9 s À1 ), whereas the k on values were significantly slower (3000 > k on > 200,000 mol À1 .s À1 ) (van der Merwe and Davis, 2003).…”
Section: Low-affinity Tcr Binding To Microbial Peptides Presented By mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The contribution of constitutive Lck activity to CD8+ memory T cell sensitivity may therefore be dependent on the antigen. For example, the virus-specific memory responses induced by gp33-specific TCR-expressing T cells (K D = 3 μM) [68] are independent of Lck activity [67]. Yet responses to lower affinity self-antigens, such as gp100 (K D = 9.3 μM) [69], as described herein, may be Lck-dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%