2021
DOI: 10.1080/23801883.2021.1899105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentia: Hobbes and Spinoza on power and popular politics Potentia: Hobbes and Spinoza on power and popular politics , by Sandra Leonie Field, New York, Oxford University Press, 2020, 312 pp., £64(hardback), ISBN 978-0-197-52824-2, £19.99(paperback), ISBN 978-0-197-53386-4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, the authors contribute to the philosophical task of questioning the Hobbesian subordination of potentiality to power, providing a critical transition from the conceptualization of modern technology as a privileged dimension where the two come together, hence perpetuating the 'process of naturalisation of power relations, based on and justified by social inequality resulting from varying degrees of access to the tools of technological production' (Altini 2010;Braidotti 2018a;Braidotti 2019b;Dane 1979;Ioan 2021;Israel 2021;Large 2017; van der Tuin & Dolphijn 2012) towards a monist neo-Spinozan project of eliciting technoecofeminist imaginaries of vital materialist politics of the future (Bennett 2010).…”
Section: Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the authors contribute to the philosophical task of questioning the Hobbesian subordination of potentiality to power, providing a critical transition from the conceptualization of modern technology as a privileged dimension where the two come together, hence perpetuating the 'process of naturalisation of power relations, based on and justified by social inequality resulting from varying degrees of access to the tools of technological production' (Altini 2010;Braidotti 2018a;Braidotti 2019b;Dane 1979;Ioan 2021;Israel 2021;Large 2017; van der Tuin & Dolphijn 2012) towards a monist neo-Spinozan project of eliciting technoecofeminist imaginaries of vital materialist politics of the future (Bennett 2010).…”
Section: Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%