1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3300639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential and limitations of a γ34.5 mutant of herpes simplex 1 as a gene therapy vector in the CNS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…60,61 The distribution pattern reported here is very similar to the one described by McMenamim and co-workers. 62 As expected, expression from the HCMV IE promoter was down-regulated efficiently shortly after delivery, and by day 14 after surgery no transduced cells were detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…60,61 The distribution pattern reported here is very similar to the one described by McMenamim and co-workers. 62 As expected, expression from the HCMV IE promoter was down-regulated efficiently shortly after delivery, and by day 14 after surgery no transduced cells were detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…16 In this study, the feasibility of administering a replicationselective HSV-1 vector by CED into normal brain was therefore examined in detail. In spite of the large number of preclinical studies that have involved the direct intracranial administration of HSV-based vectors, 17,18,[20][21][22][23][24][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] remarkably this represents the first published study to evaluate the distribution properties of an HSV-1 vector using appropriate infusion parameters in both gray and white matter, as well as evaluation of strategies to improve vector distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Clearly this has the potential to make the effective intracranial administration of HSV-1-based vectors unachievable. Nevertheless, in addition to the aforementioned clinical trials, [6][7][8][9] HSV vectors have been administered by stereotactic injection into normal mouse, [17][18][19] rat [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and primate brains, [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] animal models of high-grade glioma, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] mucopolysaccharidosis type VII, 36 GM2 gangliosidosis 37 and Parkinson's disease, [37][38][39] as well as being administered by CED into a glioma rat model. 40 In view of there being this large number of studies, it is surprising that to date no attempt has been made to systematically evaluate and optimize the delivery of these vectors directly into the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After i.c. inoculation of R3616 or 1716, virus is widely distributed via retrograde transport in neurons, and there is some expression of viral antigens and possible viral replication within the first week, which then ceases (48,55). In studies using G207 as a helper virus for defective HSV vectors, we found that inoculation in the rat substantia nigra resulted in LacZ expression only in cells surrounding the site of inoculation and not at retrograde sites that were identified by expression of the alkaline phosphatase reporter gene on the defective vector (59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%