Potential and limitations of health policy to improve coronary heart disease prevention and to reduce the burden of disease: A Russian experience

Abstract

Background Mortality from cardiovascular diseases is particularly high in Russia compared with the European average. The National Priority Project 'Health', launched in 2005, aimed to promote prevention of non-communicable diseases, particularly cardiovascular diseases, in primary care and to increase availability of state-of-art cardiovascular disease management. Methods This is a multiregional population based study with analysis of indicators for cardiovascular health and coronary heart disease in Moscow, St Petersburg, the Moscow region and across Russia, including a total population of 143.7 million inhabitants between 2005 and 2013. Data were collected using conventional methodology and originate from open statistical sources. Results The overall age-standardized coronary heart disease mortality decreased in 2005-2013 by 24.7% from 383.6 to 289.0 per 100000 population, but with substantial interregional differences: it declined from 306.1 to 196.9 per 100,000 in Moscow (-35.7%), from 362.1 to 258.9 per 100,000 in St Petersburg (-28.5%) and from 433.8 to 374.3 per 100,000 in the Moscow region (-13.7%). Income in Moscow exceeded the national average 2-3-fold, and Moscow had the highest availability of modern treatments and interventions. Although vegetables, fruits and fish consumption increased overall in Russia, this trend was most prominent in Moscow. Indicators for psychosocial well-being also were best in Moscow. Life expectancy in Moscow is almost six years higher than the Russian average. Conclusion Health policy interventions turned out to be successful but with substantial interregional differences. Lower coronary heart disease mortality and higher life expectancy in Moscow may be due to a more favourable socioeconomic and psychological environment, more healthy eating and greater availability of medical care.

Primary care use and cardiovascular disease risk in Russian 40–69 year olds: a cross-sectional study

“…The most recent reforms of the healthcare system in the Russian Federation began in 2005, with a renewed emphasis on tackling non-communicable disease and strengthening primary care. 6–8 The Federal Ministry of Health subscribes to the approach set out in the WHO declarations of Alma-Ata and, more recently, Astana, which advocates a focus on primary care, which has been found to deliver better health outcomes, improved accessibility, cost-containment and reduction of health inequalities in many healthcare systems. 9 The Russian primary care system is based on polyclinics offering a range of services to patients living in the surrounding communities.…”

Regional differences in exercise training implementation in heart failure: findings from the Exercise Training in Heart Failure (ExTraHF) survey

“…Based on our findings, shortage of resources is the main reason for the lack of ETP implementation in these centres: therefore, structural and financial issues must be considered to achieve better ETP dissemination across regions. Whatever the reasons, lack of ETP implementation might favour heath care inequalities, and the pervasiveness of inefficiency in the health care sector . The excess variability in HF management raises questions about the quality, equity, and efficiency of care.…”

“…Based on the current evidence, we hypothesize that a larger (or complete) availability of ETPs across all ESC affiliated countries may reduce the overall health costing due to an expected reduction in hospitalization and improvement in the quality of life of HF patients.…”

Comprehensive analyses of geographical inequalities in cardiovascular disease incidence and survival: A possible aid to rationalize prevention strategies

“…The association between socioeconomic status in the primary and secondary prevention of CVD has been highlighted in the European setting. [8][9][10] Preventive efforts in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods may be pursued. We experienced a political decision on the reallocation of taxes to public dental clinics within the Halland region of Sweden.…”