2004
DOI: 10.1002/app.20606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential and limits of dynamic mechanical analysis as a tool for fracture resistance evaluation of isotactic polypropylenes and their polyolefin blends

Abstract: Potential and limits of dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) as a tool for fracture resistance evaluation of isotactic polypropylenes and their polyolefin blends are presented. A minimum of information about the materials under investigation is a prerequisite to interpret the DMA traces in a right way. Although DMA is, in general, a powerful method to rank materials in term of toughness, care should be taken with (1) nucleated materials (where both intensity and strength of molecular relaxations need to be taken … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the data compiled in Table 5, though no apparent difference is found in the intensity of tan δ, the I R of the IM specimen is 36% higher in comparison with that of the SLS specimen. It has been proved that a positive correlation is exists between the I R and toughness of materials [40]. Therefore, the higher I R of the IM specimen indicates a better toughness, which is in good agreement with the experimental tested result listed in Table 4.…”
Section: Fig 8 Dynamic Mechanical Relaxation Behaviors Of the Sls Ansupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the data compiled in Table 5, though no apparent difference is found in the intensity of tan δ, the I R of the IM specimen is 36% higher in comparison with that of the SLS specimen. It has been proved that a positive correlation is exists between the I R and toughness of materials [40]. Therefore, the higher I R of the IM specimen indicates a better toughness, which is in good agreement with the experimental tested result listed in Table 4.…”
Section: Fig 8 Dynamic Mechanical Relaxation Behaviors Of the Sls Ansupporting
confidence: 88%
“…I R is defined as the magnitude of β-relaxation which is determined by the integration area under the β-relaxation peak and calculated following the detailed procedure described by C. Grein et.al. [40]. The values of T g , tan δ max and I R are listed in Table 5.The glass transition of the IM specimen occurs at a lower temperature than that of the SLS specimen.…”
Section: Fig 8 Dynamic Mechanical Relaxation Behaviors Of the Sls Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, annealing induces a significant increase of tan ı max and I R , indicative of the improved damping capacity. Generally, the impact toughness can be reflected by the magnitude of the ␤-relaxation (I R ) [58,59]. Anyway, the DMA results suggest that annealing is favorable to the improvement of the fracture toughness and damping capacity simultaneously.…”
Section: Further Understanding Of Toughening Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…DMA has also been proved to be a useful tool in estimating the fracture toughness of polymer and its blends [58][59][60]. The increase in tan ı max and I R is representative of, respectively, the maximum and total energy dissipated because of viscoelastic relaxation of iPP component.…”
Section: Further Understanding Of Toughening Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the  c -relaxation is greatly shifted to high temperatures, indicating the increased amount of rigid amorphous molecules and/or the increased degree of restriction for the rigid amorphous molecules, resulting in more energy requirement for the occurrence of  c -relaxation. Generally, the magnitude of -relaxation of iPP matrix (I R-iPP ), which represents the total energy dissipation because of viscoelastic relaxation, can be also used to reflect the fracture toughness of sample under the load condition [39] . Here, I R-iPP was calculated.…”
Section: Variation Of Relaxation Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%