2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2012.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential antioxidant properties and hepatoprotective effects of an aqueous extract formula derived from three Chinese medicinal herbs against CCl4-induced liver injury in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
19
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang et al [7] dose of silymarin were two times higher and El-Adawi et al [9] dose was 7.5 times lower than ours, but Megahed et al [26] dose was one out of five from us. And the administration routes were same with Raskovic et al [25], Yang et al [7], ElAdawi et al [9], Megahed et al [26] and Chen et al [23] studies and different from Horvath et al study [7,9,[23][24][25][26]. And also SDOA rate (10%) was same with Vardi et al [6], Yilmaz et al [27] and Parlakpinar et al [28] studies, and two times more than Yilmaz et al [4,6,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Yang et al [7] dose of silymarin were two times higher and El-Adawi et al [9] dose was 7.5 times lower than ours, but Megahed et al [26] dose was one out of five from us. And the administration routes were same with Raskovic et al [25], Yang et al [7], ElAdawi et al [9], Megahed et al [26] and Chen et al [23] studies and different from Horvath et al study [7,9,[23][24][25][26]. And also SDOA rate (10%) was same with Vardi et al [6], Yilmaz et al [27] and Parlakpinar et al [28] studies, and two times more than Yilmaz et al [4,6,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In mammalian body, the liver is the only organ that quickly regenerates after injury or surgical resection [2,7]. In the present study, silymarin dose was the same as Chen et al [23], two times higher than Horvath et al [24] and higher than Raskovic et al studies [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations