2019
DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.13119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential application of electronic nose coupled with chemometric tools for authentication assessment in tomato paste

Abstract: In this study, adulteration in tomato paste was investigated using a gas sensors array. For this purpose, olfactory machine system was evaluated based on five gas sensors to investigate pumpkin, potato, and starch adulteration (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20%). Principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM), and partial least square (PLS) methods were used for classification and analysis of sensors response. The use of PCA method in the classification of pumpkin, pot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the AUC and F values were 0.992 and 0.983, respectively. The results obtained in this research were consistent with other products, such as different oil types and adulterated safflower seed oil [58], minced mutton mixed with pork [59], oranges [60], and tomato paste [61]. Moreover, in another study, the electronic nose was used by Gomez, et al [62] to identify the ripening state of tomatoes, and the results revealed that the electronic nose was able to discriminate the ripening states of tomatoes.…”
Section: Linear Discriminant Analysis (Lda)supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Additionally, the AUC and F values were 0.992 and 0.983, respectively. The results obtained in this research were consistent with other products, such as different oil types and adulterated safflower seed oil [58], minced mutton mixed with pork [59], oranges [60], and tomato paste [61]. Moreover, in another study, the electronic nose was used by Gomez, et al [62] to identify the ripening state of tomatoes, and the results revealed that the electronic nose was able to discriminate the ripening states of tomatoes.…”
Section: Linear Discriminant Analysis (Lda)supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Lo Feudo et al [ 71 ], for example, evaluated its origin (Italian, Italian regions, and non-Italian) by ICP-MS, quantifying the concentration of 32 elements. Two more studies focused their attention on quantifying possible tomato sauce adulterations by NIR spectroscopy and electronic tongue [ 72 ], or electronic nose [ 73 ]. Finally, Boukid et al [ 74 ] evaluated the effect of thermal treatments and the addition of ingredients in the physical properties of tomato double concentrate, another tomato product similar to tomato sauce.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as already stated, no chemical reagents were used in the current work, making the analyses cheaper and cleaner. The untargeted methods coupled with chemometrics [ 72 , 73 ] are able to extract useful information with a lower analysis effort, optimizing times and costs without losing effectiveness. In addition, as shown for GC-IMS analysis in this work, and in line with the work of Vitalis et al [ 72 ], an untargeted method can be carried out to obtain a fingerprint of the samples; then, with the help of chemometrics, some particularly interesting variables can be highlighted and deeply studied, without the need of an in-depth quantification of all the possible analytes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E-Nose able to classify and determine aroma through statistical analysis based on sensor output [9], such as principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis [10], support vector machine (SVM), and partial least squares (PLS) [11]. A considerable amount of literature has been published on stepwise linear discriminant analysis [12,13], these studies provide important insight into E-Nose classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%