2023
DOI: 10.3390/app132312830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Benefits of Horizontal Wells for CO2 Injection to Enhance Storage Security and Reduce Leakage Risks

Marcos Vitor Barbosa Machado,
Mojdeh Delshad,
Kamy Sepehrnoori

Abstract: This study used numerical simulations of CO2 storage to identify the benefits of horizontal wells for geological carbon storage, such as enhancing CO2 trapped in porous media due to relative permeability and capillary hysteresis. Two injection schemes were tested: one using a vertical injector and the other employing a horizontal well. The results revealed two main findings. Firstly, the horizontal injection well effectively prevented or minimized CO2 penetration into the caprock across various sensitivity sce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the end of the injection phase (Figure 7B), the CO 2 has predominantly remained within the reservoir boundaries. By 70 years (Figure 7C), there is a slight presence of CO 2 detectable in the surrounding rock formation mainly through diffusion or a numerical artifact driven by diffusion due to the course grid considered in our model, as discussed in [59,85]. However, this penetration is minimal and does not constitute a leakage concern as absence of fractures or other flow localization features in this model is assumed.…”
Section: Co 2 Injection Flow Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the end of the injection phase (Figure 7B), the CO 2 has predominantly remained within the reservoir boundaries. By 70 years (Figure 7C), there is a slight presence of CO 2 detectable in the surrounding rock formation mainly through diffusion or a numerical artifact driven by diffusion due to the course grid considered in our model, as discussed in [59,85]. However, this penetration is minimal and does not constitute a leakage concern as absence of fractures or other flow localization features in this model is assumed.…”
Section: Co 2 Injection Flow Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The imbibition curves are generated according to the hysteresis model, which is detailed in the next section. The dynamic properties used in this model are based on the characterization proposed by Machado et al [59], and it will be discussed in the next paragraphs. The relative permeability curves for CO2 and brine in sandstone and shale were obtained from Bennion and Bachu [60].…”
Section: Petrophysical Modeling For Sandstone and Shalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the primary changes observed in the model are concentrated at the top of the injection interval and in the shallowest layers. This observation raises concerns regarding the integrity of the caprock, as discussed in [62]. These changes can be attributed to the upward migration of CO 2 within the reservoir, driven by its buoyancy, resulting in a localized concentration of effects near the injection zone.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most critical barriers to long-term and large-volume CO2 storage in geological formations is the proof of safe and reliable storage. For that, CO2 can take advantage of different trapping mechanisms in porous media [2][3][4][5][6]; for example, free CO2 migration is controlled by the structural and stratigraphic trapping exerted by the caprock during the short-term encompassing the injection time, known as a primary mechanism [7]. Part of that mobile CO2 will be dissolved in the water (solubility trapping) as time passes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%