2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.03.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential biomarkers for effective screening of neonatal sepsis infections: An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
118
1
24

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
4
118
1
24
Order By: Relevance
“…The main consequence of the variability exemplified above is that the abuse of antibiotics occurs as a consequence of seeking to prevent mortality due to sepsis [22]; which reinforces the concept known historically, that the decision to administer or not antimicrobial, depends more on the clinical evolution and the identified picture, than on the result of the different biomarkers or diagnostic tools proposed for sepsis [23] [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The main consequence of the variability exemplified above is that the abuse of antibiotics occurs as a consequence of seeking to prevent mortality due to sepsis [22]; which reinforces the concept known historically, that the decision to administer or not antimicrobial, depends more on the clinical evolution and the identified picture, than on the result of the different biomarkers or diagnostic tools proposed for sepsis [23] [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The probability of sepsis can be guided by pre-antibiotic initiation blood culture, full blood count (FBC), serial CRP, and procalcitonin (PCT) [64][65][66]. Blood culture and FBC are the most common and standard diagnostic measure for EOS in the most center [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRP is a widely used biomarker with high specificity but low sensitivity because it also rises with non-infectious event; hence, it cannot be used alone [65,70]. Serial CRP at 24 h and 48 h can be helpful to assist decision-making whether to continue antibiotic despite sterile blood culture and normal FBC [31,71,72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has the limitation of moderate sensitivity but has good negative predictive value. Other markers were having moderate sensitivity though direct towards diagnosis (Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, cytokines and interleukins (IL-6, IL-8, CD 11b) [48] but are not confirmative [49] IL-6 is reported to be a sensitive and specific indicator for the diagnosis of the NS due to PROM [49]. CRP and procalcitonin though are more specific there is no single confirmatory test; hence, a panel of test that includes haematological, biochemical assays, culture (blood, urine and cerebrospinal fluid) & sensitivity and radiological evaluation (chest, abdomen) is recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%