Potential breeding distributions of U.S. birds predicted with both short‐term variability and long‐term average climate data

Abstract

Climate conditions, such as temperature or precipitation, averaged over several decades strongly affect species distributions, as evidenced by experimental results and a plethora of models demonstrating statistical relations between species occurrences and long-term climate averages. However, long-term averages can conceal climate changes that have occurred in recent decades and may not capture actual species occurrence well because the distributions of species, especially at the edges of their range, are typically dynamic and may respond strongly to short-term climate variability. Our goal here was to test whether bird occurrence models can be predicted by either covariates based on short-term climate variability or on long-term climate averages. We parameterized species distribution models (SDMs) based on either short-term variability or long-term average climate covariates for 320 bird species in the conterminous USA and tested whether any life-history trait-based guilds were particularly sensitive to short-term conditions. Models including short-term climate variability performed well based on their cross-validated area-under-the-curve AUC score (0.85), as did models based on long-term climate averages (0.84). Similarly, both models performed well compared to independent presence/absence data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey (independent AUC of 0.89 and 0.90, respectively). However, models based on short-term variability covariates more accurately classified true absences for most species (73% of true absences classified within the lowest quarter of environmental suitability vs. 68%). In addition, they have the advantage that they can reveal the dynamic relationship between species and their environment because they capture the spatial fluctuations of species potential breeding distributions. With this information, we can identify which species and guilds are sensitive to climate variability, identify sites of high conservation value where climate variability is low, and assess how species' potential distributions may have already shifted due recent climate change. However, long-term climate averages require less data and processing time and may be more readily available for some areas of interest. Where data on short-term climate variability are not available, long-term climate information is a sufficient predictor of species distributions in many cases. However, short-term climate variability data may provide information not captured with long-term climate data for use in SDMs.

Modelling species responses to extreme weather provides new insights into constraints on range and likely climate change impacts for Australian mammals

“…Across species, EXT and COMP models tended to predict more restrictive suitable ranges than AVG models suggesting that extreme weather conditions might limit species distributions in areas theoretically suitable in terms of long‐term mean climatic conditions. In other words, models based on long‐term averages might be over predicting the amount of environmental suitable area for a species, at least in some areas (Zimmermann et al , Reside et al , Bateman et al , , Briscoe et al ). Divergences between model predictions showed strong patterns in geographic and environmental space (Supplementary material Appendix 7), providing general insight into key processes that may be missed by failing to consider a broad suite of climate variables.…”

Species‐specific and temporal scale‐dependent responses of birds to drought

“…Previous studies have also tended to focus on raw climatic variables to assess bird responses to precipitation variability (e.g., Bateman et al, 2016;Illán et al, 2014). However, using metrics that more comprehensively capture deviations from average moisture conditions, such as the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index ("SPEI"), may also reveal important patterns.…”

Monitoring boreal avian populations: how can we estimate trends and trajectories from noisy data?

“…Drivers also act across a range of temporal scales, often concurrently, and may produce lagged responses at the population level. For example, climatic episodes such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation influence weather patterns over broad spatial and temporal scales (Stenseth et al 2003) and have been shown to affect demographic rates (Nott et al 2002, Lamanna et al 2012), long-term population trajectories, and resultant species distributions (Luoto et al 2007, Bateman et al 2016…”