Potential carbon emission abatement cost recovery from carbon emission trading in China

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to provide an estimation of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission abatement costs in China’s industry sector during the period of 2006-2010, and additionally provide an ex-post estimation of CO2 abatement cost savings that would be realized if carbon emission permits trading among different industry sectors of 30 provinces in China during the same period were allowed, to answer the question that whether the industrial carbon emission abatement cost can (partially) be recovered from carbon emission trading in China. Design/methodology/approach The joint production framework associated with the environmental technology is utilized for formulating the models for estimating abatement costs and simulating emission permits trading scheme. Several data envelopment analysis-based models that could deal with both the desirable and undesirable outputs within the above framework are utilized for abatement cost saving estimation. The weak disposability assumption and variable returns to scale assumption are applied in the modelling. Findings In China’s industry sector, during 2006-2010, the estimated CO2 emission abatement cost was 1,842 billion yuan, which accounts for 2.45 per cent of China’s total industrial output value; the emission abatement cost saving from emission permits trading would be 315 billion yuan, which accounts for 17.12 per cent of the emission opportunity abatement cost; and additional 1,065.95 million tonnes of CO2 emission reductions would be realized from emission permits trading, and this accounts for 4.75 per cent of the total industrial CO2 emissions. Research limitations/implications The estimation is implemented at the regional level, i.e. the emission permits trading subjects are the whole industry sectors in different Chinese provinces, because of the data limitation in this study. Further estimation could be implemented at the enterprise level to provide a deeper insight into the abatement cost recovery from emission permits trading. Practical implications The estimation models and calculation process introduced in this study could be applied for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of pollutant emission permits trading schemes from the perspective that whether these market-based abatement policy instruments help to realize the potential abatement cost savings. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no study has provided the estimation of CO2 emission abatement cost and the estimation of CO2 abatement cost saving effect from emission permits trading for China’s industry sector. This study provides the first attempt to fill this research gap.

Review and reflections of legislation and policies on shipping decarbonization under China’s “dual carbon” target

“…Market-based mechanisms are designed to internalize the external costs of GHG emissions based on the polluter-pays principle (Wang et al, 2021)and provide economic incentives related to GHG emission reduction (Harilaos, 2012;Daniel, 2018). It has been manifest that the market transaction policy can enhance the economic and emission reduction potential more than the command control policy can (Wang et al, 2016).The adoption of carbon reduction measures based on market mechanisms is the current choice of instruments for regulating GHG emissions in many countries and the International Maritime Organization (Kirval and ÇaliŞkan, 2022). For example, the European Commission voted in July 2021 to adopt the "fit for 55" action plan package.…”

Will Pollution Taxes Improve Joint Ecological and Economic Efficiency of Thermal Power Industry in China?: A DEA‐Based Materials Balance Approach

“…; Wang et al. ), (3) multiplicative inverse or additive inverse outputs (Sahoo et al. ; Seiford and Zhu ), (4) by‐production traded outputs (Murty et al.…”