is the disconnect between energy-climate models and social scientific analyses of consumption. Projected energy demand is based on income growth, with the implicit assumption that future generations are better off with more, and that energy use is essential for that betterment. This belies the evidence accumulated from more than four decades of empirical social science that a significant share of consumption signals status rather than serves material needs 8,9 , that the well-off may not get happier 10,11,12 , that growth can mask high inequality 13 and environmental injustice 14 , and that energy services can be provided much, much more efficiently 5 . Further, historical cross-country studies show that progress in other well-being measures, such as life expectancy or basic needs satisfaction, is less energyintensive 15, 16,17 . The challenge for future research is to assess, quantify, and forecast energy demand and its consequences for climate change in relation to consumption. Tying