2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02681-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential clinical utility of liquid biopsy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract: Background Liquid biopsy has been widely researched for early diagnosis, prognostication and disease monitoring in lung cancer, but there is a need to investigate its clinical utility for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate diagnostic and prognostic values of liquid biopsy for early-stage NSCLC, regarding the common biomarkers, circulating tumor cells, circulating tu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, patients with undetectable MRD after surgery cannot benefit from adjuvant therapy. And this finding was further confirmed by a meta‐analysis of 5 studies [27]. Taken together, these findings strongly imply that the MRD status can guide the individualized therapy for NSCLC although randomized trials are needed to confirm its predictive value.…”
Section: Future Clinical Scenarios Of Mrd In Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, patients with undetectable MRD after surgery cannot benefit from adjuvant therapy. And this finding was further confirmed by a meta‐analysis of 5 studies [27]. Taken together, these findings strongly imply that the MRD status can guide the individualized therapy for NSCLC although randomized trials are needed to confirm its predictive value.…”
Section: Future Clinical Scenarios Of Mrd In Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…It is well known that ctDNA‐MRD detection generally precedes radiographical relapse by several months, which refers to ctDNA lead time. In a recent meta‐analysis of nine eligible ctDNA studies [27], the average ctDNA lead time was 179 ± 74 days of 148 patients suffering disease progression. To date, no specific studies have explored the clinical significance of this valuable time frame.…”
Section: Detecting Mrd In Patients With Lung Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating signatures to identify the tissue origin could facilitate more credible diagnoses, such as methylation profiles and nucleosome positioning. 77 As for further management, apart from the promising implications in efficacy prediction and recurrence monitoring, 78 ctDNA allows the identification of more aggressive tumor in MLCs, which contains outgrowing subclones with greater shedding, and inform different treatments. 74 Further studies are required to understand the roles of other types of liquid biopsy such as circulating tumor cells, exosomes, and circulating RNA 78 in discriminating MLCs.…”
Section: Genomics-based Methods For Discriminating Mlcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of minute amounts of chemical and biological species serving as biomarkers has become of utmost importance in numerous fields, particularly in the context of early diagnosis, prognosis, and relapse of cancer diseases. , The need of novel bioanalytical tools with improved analytical performance characteristics has been addressed by intense research in novel nanomaterials and readout techniques, paving the way toward ultrasensitive biosensors and bioassays. , Through rapid advancements in the development of various types of physiochemical transducers and output signal amplification, detection at the single molecule level has become possible. A generic route to push sensitivity to this ultimate level relies on compartmenting of analyzed sample volume to large series of miniature reactors, in which an enzymatic reaction can generate a measurable signal in the presence of the target analyte. , Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR, developed for the analysis of nucleic acids) or digital enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (dELISA, introduced for detection of proteins) represent examples where the enzymatically generated output signal allows us to distinguish the presence of individual target molecules against background, given the compartment volume is sufficiently small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%