2014
DOI: 10.1177/0309133314528942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential contributions of remote sensing to ecosystem service assessments

Abstract: Abstract. Ecological and conservation research has provided a strong scientific underpinning to the modeling of ecosystem services (ESs) over space and time, by identifying the ecological processes and components of biodiversity (ecosystem service providers, functional traits) that drive ES supply. Despite this knowledge, efforts to map the distribution of ESs often rely on simple spatial surrogates that provide incomplete and non-mechanistic representations of the biophysical variables they are intended to pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 201 publications
(320 reference statements)
1
73
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Awareness of these changes is growing and, therefore, a series of studies have been designed to detect and quantify their extent (ten CATEN et al, 2015;GRECCHI et al, 2014;ROCHA et al, 2011). Currently, geo-technological systems and products are indispensable tools for spatial and temporal detection, evaluation and monitoring of problems related to the environment (GÓMEZ et al, 2016;ANDREW et al, 2014;BODART et al, 2013;BODART et al, 2011). This is due to distinct data integration and overlapping at varied scales by geographic information systems (GISs), facilitating decision-making and shifts, if necessary, on land use and occupation policies (BEUCHLE et al, 2015;ten CATEN et al, 2015;MÜLLER et al, 2015;COELHO et al, 2014;GIRI et al, 2013;POTAPOV et al, 2011;DURIGAN & RATTER, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Awareness of these changes is growing and, therefore, a series of studies have been designed to detect and quantify their extent (ten CATEN et al, 2015;GRECCHI et al, 2014;ROCHA et al, 2011). Currently, geo-technological systems and products are indispensable tools for spatial and temporal detection, evaluation and monitoring of problems related to the environment (GÓMEZ et al, 2016;ANDREW et al, 2014;BODART et al, 2013;BODART et al, 2011). This is due to distinct data integration and overlapping at varied scales by geographic information systems (GISs), facilitating decision-making and shifts, if necessary, on land use and occupation policies (BEUCHLE et al, 2015;ten CATEN et al, 2015;MÜLLER et al, 2015;COELHO et al, 2014;GIRI et al, 2013;POTAPOV et al, 2011;DURIGAN & RATTER, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, there has been considerable recent focus on the development and use of standardised remotely sensed-products (Andrew et al, 2014;Seppelt et al, 2011). These products, which are largely land cover/land use type products but also include NDVI and other remotely sensed variables, tend to be produced from a single satellite sensor, removing variability associated with multiple sensor characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing-derived estimates of biodiversity based on productivity, disturbance, topography, and land cover have been proposed [30] along with studies of animal and plant invasions [31] and soil organic carbon [32]. Remote sensing can be used to assess ecosystem services using a broad range of measured or modeled groups of variables, such as plant functional traits, soil characteristics, biogeochemical cycling, and water availability [33].…”
Section: Use Of Remote Sensing To Detect Spatial Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%