The impact of model membrane degradation compounds on the relevant electrochemical parameters for the oxygen reduction reaction (i.e. electrochemical surface area and catalytic activity), was studied for both polycrystalline Pt and carbon supported Pt electrocatalysts. Model compounds, representing previously published, experimentally determined polymer electrolyte membrane degradation products, were in the form of perfluorinated organic acids that contained combinations of carboxylic and/or sulfonic acid functionality. Perfluorinated carboxylic acids of carbon chain length C1 -C6 were found to have an impact on electrochemical surface area (ECA). The longest chain length acid also hindered the observed oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) performance, resulting in a 17% loss in kinetic current (determined at 0.9 V). Model compounds containing sulfonic acid functional groups alone did not show an effect on Pt ECA or ORR activity. Greater than a 44% loss in ORR activity at 0.9 V was observed for diacid model compounds DA-Naf (perfluoro(2-methyl-3-oxa-5-sulfonic pentanoic) acid) and DA-3M (perfluoro(4-sulfonic butanoic) acid), which contained both sulfonic and carboxylic acid functionalities. While there has been a concerted effort to develop membranes and electrocatalysts that significantly improve the performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), systematic studies on the magnitude and mechanism of electrocatalyst performance degradation due to contaminants arising from system components have been less prevalent. With a Department of Energy 2017 target of less than 10% voltage degradation over 5000 hours of automotive fuel cell performance, and a 2013 status of 3600 hours, improvement in the area of durability is still required.1 Air, fuel, and system derived chemical contaminants can contribute to irreversible performance loss. However, due to the fact that many factors can affect durability in a fuel cell system, it is difficult to relate the performance loss to the degradation of specific component(s). And failure mechanisms are not well understood.
2Numerous studies focusing on the performance impact of impurities found in the anode fuel stream (e.g. CO, CO 2 , H 2 S, NH 3 , CH 4 and HCOOH), as well as common airborne contaminants present in the cathode stream (e.g. SO x and NO x ) have been conducted. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In addition, various research groups have examined the impact of aromatic contaminants and environmentally common anionic and cationic species. and Co 2+ ), originating from the bipolar plates and catalyst layer.
19-25Results of these studies show, in many cases, severe effects on fuel cell performance due in large to anion adsorption and irreversible chemisorption of poisoning compounds on the catalyst layer, as well as foreign cation uptake in the membrane. More recently, an investigation of species originating from balance of plant (BOP) components (e.g. structural materials and assembly aids) has shown fuel cell performance loss due to additives and other compoun...