ObjectiveConcentrating on oncogenic role and increased plasma expression of microRNA(miR) 106b~25 clusters (involving miR 106b, miR 93 and miR 25), we evaluated significance of the over-expression of plasma miR 106b~25 in GC.MethodsBased on 65 pairs matched GC patients and health controls, we explored clinical significance of miR 106b~25 for GC and compared their diagnostic performance with conventional tumor biomarkers including CA724, CA242, CA199 and CEA.ResultsBoth miR 106b~25 cluster and conventional tumor biomarkers were significantly elevated in GC (All P<0.05). In ROC curves, miR 106b had the highest AUC (0.898) in diagnosing GC with optimal sensitivity of 86.2% and specificity of 92.3% at the cut-off value of 1.385. MiR 25 had moderate diagnostic efficacy (AUC = 0.817) with sensitivity of 87.6% and specificity of 76.9% at the threshold of 1.015. The AUC of miR 93 (0.756) was the lowest. The AUC, sensitivity, accuracy and Youden index of miR 106b were higher than all of four conventional biomarkers, while its specificity is higher than CA242 and CA724. The AUC of miR 25 was also higher than CA724, CA242 and CA199, while AUC of miR 93 was only higher than CA199 and CA724. Compared the diagnostic efficacy via ROC curves, miR 106b was significantly higher diagnostic efficacy than CA724, CA242 and CA199, the diagnostic efficacies of miR 93 and miR 25 were significantly higher than CA199(all P<0.05).ConclusionsPlasma miR 106b~25 cluster, especially miR 106b, were significantly increased in GC patients and may be hopeful diagnostic biomarkers.