2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential dimensions for a local e-Government services quality model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…From typical services by crewed setup to online websites or e-portals and then to self-serving automatic machine, all frames are engulfed by the scales for gauging service quality. Literature pertained validity of such models (S. Janita & Miranda, 2018;Palese & Usai, 2018;Sá a, Roch, & Cota, 2016;Sepasgozar et al, 2018;Shahid Iqbal, Ul Hassan, & Habibah, 2018). The IoT is an interconnected setup of electronic things entailing various devices motorized or digitized base, humans or animals that are categorized through distinct identification pattern, the UIDs, to communicate the information throughout system (Rouse, 2016).…”
Section: Iot-servqualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From typical services by crewed setup to online websites or e-portals and then to self-serving automatic machine, all frames are engulfed by the scales for gauging service quality. Literature pertained validity of such models (S. Janita & Miranda, 2018;Palese & Usai, 2018;Sá a, Roch, & Cota, 2016;Sepasgozar et al, 2018;Shahid Iqbal, Ul Hassan, & Habibah, 2018). The IoT is an interconnected setup of electronic things entailing various devices motorized or digitized base, humans or animals that are categorized through distinct identification pattern, the UIDs, to communicate the information throughout system (Rouse, 2016).…”
Section: Iot-servqualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Nayek (2018) evaluated metadata quality of six national OGD sites, whereas Kubler and their colleagues (Kubler, Robert, Neumaier, Umbrich, & Le Traon, 2018) established an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for comparing and ranking sites for the quality of their metadata from a usercentered perspective. In addition, there are notable studies that compared the content and features of US municipal OGD sites (Thorsby et al, 2016), developed 30 criteria for evaluating e-government services (Sá, Rocha, & Pérez Cota, 2016), created a framework for measuring OGD quality and applied it to two Italian datasets (Vetro et al, 2016), evaluated the effectiveness of platforms for promoting transparency (Lourenço, 2015), and presented (but did not apply) a framework to measure the overall quality of national OGD sites (Ubaldi, 2013).…”
Section: Evaluating Ogd Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These statements accentuate that effective leadership has a great chances for enhancement of municipal awareness together with citizen satisfaction for service delivery process in local government administration [24,25,81]. Adjustment on the ways in which governments are conducting affairs of the local government service delivery to the ever-changing demands of local community as well as to address the inequalities of the past decades administration [68,83,91].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%