2012
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2012.688148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential effects in multi-resolution post-classification change detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We resampled the two coarse resolution maps of 60 m to 30 m using the nearest neighbor algorithm to avoid information loss in the three fine spatial resolution maps. This procedure has been found to perform similarly to the resampling method, which coarsens the fine resolution map [79].…”
Section: Quantification Of Land Cover Change and Habitat Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We resampled the two coarse resolution maps of 60 m to 30 m using the nearest neighbor algorithm to avoid information loss in the three fine spatial resolution maps. This procedure has been found to perform similarly to the resampling method, which coarsens the fine resolution map [79].…”
Section: Quantification Of Land Cover Change and Habitat Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We quantified land cover change by means of the post-classification inter-comparison technique, nowadays one of the most used change detection approaches [79]. It implies a pixel-by-pixel comparison of separately classified images where the same cell size is required.…”
Section: Quantification Of Land Cover Change and Habitat Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial co-registration errors were estimated with an iterative two-step approach: (1) coarsening Landsat data to the MODIS grid cell size and (2) correlation. This process was repeated within a defined window displacing Landsat data by a specified interval in x-and y-direction, and the offset with the highest correlation coefficient indicates the displacement between both images [45]. In this study, the correlations are based on the NDVI from downloaded Landsat images and the closest available MODIS composite.…”
Section: Spatial Co-registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of simply reassigning smaller members by the surrounding majorities as the way of MMUs [5], we use the self-adaptive morphology to depict the inter-member dependency for a more reliable reassigning. Based on the member-level spatial analysis, each misclassified dark grass member will be readjusted according to the inter-member dependency rule.…”
Section: Readjusting Misclassified Members Based On the Member-level mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remotely sensed imagery is an important source data available to characterize changes systematically and consistently [4]. Despite both frequent criticism and the availability of many alternatives, change detection from remotely sensed imagery still remains one of the most applied techniques due to its simplicity and intuitive manner [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%