“…The figure indicates that the activation barrier, measured by the height of the first peak in each plot preceding the first local energy minimum is highest for the tfb configuration, followed by that for the bfb, the tfb(1), the bfb(1), the tfb(2), the bfb(3/4), the tfb(3/4), and the bfb(2) configuration, showing that the barrier to H 2 dissociative adsorption decreases when there is vacancy on the Pt surface. The corresponding calculated numerical values for the barrier potentials are given in Table I, rows 7-8, along with those previously reported [15] for the cases of the H 2 CM above the top and bridge sites, i.e., rows 3-6. It can be seen that from the original values of 0.409 eV and 0.414 eV for the bfb and tfb configurations, respectively, the barrier potentials are greatly reduced to as low as 0.034 eV (bfb(2) and 0.043 eV (tfb(3/4)), respectively.…”