2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential environmental influences on variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism among Arizona populations of the western diamond-backed rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(69 reference statements)
3
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean litter size was 4.3±1.9 neonates. Although the mean litter size in our population is small relative to other regions, both litter size and adult body size vary geographically for this species [32], [34], [39]. Our findings of small and sometimes frequent (e.g., annual) litters are consistent with past research done at this and nearby sites [22], [23], [39], [72].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mean litter size was 4.3±1.9 neonates. Although the mean litter size in our population is small relative to other regions, both litter size and adult body size vary geographically for this species [32], [34], [39]. Our findings of small and sometimes frequent (e.g., annual) litters are consistent with past research done at this and nearby sites [22], [23], [39], [72].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Arizona exhibits broad physiographic structure and multiple biotic communities within a relatively narrow latitudinal range (Brown, 1994); C. atrox occupies the southern half of the state and inhabits most these biotic regions (Campbell & Lamar, 2004). Amarello et al (2010) demonstrated, moreover, that adults of C. atrox were significantly larger (SVL) in regions that were wetter and cooler, two variables that are presumably associated with increased opportunities to acquire prey (e.g. rodents) and hence acquire sufficient reserves for reproduction (Rosen & Goldberg, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body size plays a central role in a variety of life history traits as well as in the physiology, morphology and ecology of animals (Peters, 1983;Shine, 1994a;Bonnet et al, 2000;Amarello et al, 2010). Variables such as energy needs (Nagy, 1987), dietary habits (McNabb, 1988), water requirements (Nagy and Peterson, 1988), animal distribution (Blackburn and Gaston, 1994), geographical range size (Pyron, 1999;Wollenberg et al, 2011), locomotory speed (Taylor et al, 1982) and body condition (Schulte-Hostedde et al, 2005), among many other characteristics, have all been related to body size of animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%