43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-1295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Formulation for Aeroelastic Constraint Analysis in a Conceptual Design Environment

Abstract: The paper defines an innovative, novel design methodology that results in a product that effectively satisfies the designer's needs and requirements. Use is made of the response surface methodology after consideration of other metamodeling techniques. Drawbacks of the response surface methodology are mitigated by incorporating sensitivity information in the response surface creation. The definition, application, and eventual implementation of this emerging design tool for new product design is described. The n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An MDO environment at this stage can speed up the process and it can also consider more disciplines than standard procedures to bring more information to support decisions. From the best of the authors' knowledge, there are several works admitting MDO methodology at conceptual and preliminary design [2,3,9,16,24,26], although none of them include aeroelastic characteristics as relevant information to those design stages. Caixeta Jr. and Marques [4,5] have included aeroelastic characteristics through neural networks for the particular optimal design of flexible wings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An MDO environment at this stage can speed up the process and it can also consider more disciplines than standard procedures to bring more information to support decisions. From the best of the authors' knowledge, there are several works admitting MDO methodology at conceptual and preliminary design [2,3,9,16,24,26], although none of them include aeroelastic characteristics as relevant information to those design stages. Caixeta Jr. and Marques [4,5] have included aeroelastic characteristics through neural networks for the particular optimal design of flexible wings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen [5] proposed a complex wing box system and studied empirical mode decomposition (EMD) by using the Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT). Baets [6,7] investigated the sensitivity of the flutter speed, divergence speed and modal response when varying the composite skin lay-up, fiber orientation, and the root flexibility of the model. Ovesy [8] concluded that optimum lay-up configuration had great dependency to the buckling modal shape of the wing box.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous BLISS studies 3,8,9 , polynomial RS models have been used. The response surface methodology 10 was originally developed in experimental sciences, but it has become popular to fit computer simulation results.…”
Section: Choice Of Surrogate Model For Blissmentioning
confidence: 99%