2016
DOI: 10.18869/iahs.3.3.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Health Risk Assessment of Cr, Cu, Fe and Zn for Human Population via Consumption of Commercial Spices; a Case Study of Hamedan City, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The oral reference doses were 0.04, 0.0035, and 0.30 for Cu, Pb, and Zn, respectively. An HRI < 1 means that the exposed population is assumed to be safe (26,27).…”
Section: Analysis Of Food-related Health Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oral reference doses were 0.04, 0.0035, and 0.30 for Cu, Pb, and Zn, respectively. An HRI < 1 means that the exposed population is assumed to be safe (26,27).…”
Section: Analysis Of Food-related Health Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proven that skin irritation, running nose, irritation to the lining of the nose, nose ulcers, liver damage, kidney failure, breathing problems, and circulatory and nerve disorders are the main effects arising from breathing and or long-term exposure to Cr (VI) [12]. Major sources of Cr-contamination in the soil include the disposal of Cr containing wastes and electroplating processes [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromium is mainly used in stainless steel production. Therefore, stainless steel vessels seem to be the main source of Cr contamination [11,12]. Lead (Pb) is present in the environment because of air, water, and soil pollution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oral reference doses (mg/kg/day) of metals were 1.50 for Cr, 0.04 for Cu, 0.643 for Fe, 0.014 for Mn and 0.02 for Ni (Harmanescu, Alda, Bordean, Gogoasa, & Gergen, 2011;Xue, Liu, Liu, & Yan, 2012;Omar et al, 2013;Liang, Xue, Wang, Sun, Yang, & Liu, 2015;Zeng, Wang, Wang, Guo, Chen, & Zhuang, 2015;Sobhanardakani, 2016). In this regard, the HRI <1 means the exposed population is assumed to be safe.…”
Section: Potential Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%