“…Acknowledging the magnitude of the (potential) impacts ITPS have on protected areas, recent studies have turned their attention to the assessment of invasive species in Natura 2000 sites and large protected areas focusing on complex evaluations (e.g. origin and geographic distribution, biology, habitat description) (Dumitrașcu et al, 2011(Dumitrașcu et al, , 2012(Dumitrașcu et al, , 2014Dumitrașcu and Grigorescu, 2016;Grigorescu et al, 2016b;Niculescu et al, 2016;Sămărghiţan et al, 2018); chorology and ecology (Doroftei, 2009a, b); biological indicators ; climate change-related impacts (Doroftei and Anastasiu, 2014); modelling the potential distribution (Kucsicsa et al, 2013(Kucsicsa et al, , 2016(Kucsicsa et al, , 2018Grigorescu et al, 2016a, c). Thus, among all analysed ITPS in the Romanian protected areas, ten have been identified as the most widespread, of which the most studied were Amorpha fruticosa, Ailanthus altissima, Acer negundo, Fallopia japonica and Impatiens glandulifera (Dumitrascu and Grigorescu, 2016).…”