2012
DOI: 10.1118/1.4709605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential increase in biological effectiveness from field timing optimization for stereotactic body radiation therapy

Abstract: Rearranging field timing for a SBRT treatment so that maximal dose is deposited in the central fields of treatment may optimize cell kill and potentially affect overall treatment outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore widely accepted that one approach to improve the efficacy of cancer therapy is the development of rational combinations of anticancer agents that may exhibit synergistic interactions. The introduction of several biologic agents represents an important advance in the management of NSCLC and some of them have shown to have a synergistic effect when given in combination with radiotherapy and chemotherapy in preclinical and clinical models (13)(14)(15). In the present review we discuss the rationale and the feasibility of these combinations and demonstrate the early results available from clinical trials using the BCBS units.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is therefore widely accepted that one approach to improve the efficacy of cancer therapy is the development of rational combinations of anticancer agents that may exhibit synergistic interactions. The introduction of several biologic agents represents an important advance in the management of NSCLC and some of them have shown to have a synergistic effect when given in combination with radiotherapy and chemotherapy in preclinical and clinical models (13)(14)(15). In the present review we discuss the rationale and the feasibility of these combinations and demonstrate the early results available from clinical trials using the BCBS units.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Repair half-times of up to 154 min have been found by Amdur et al (1994) for the normal cell line AG1522 and 31 min with HTB-35 uterine-cervical cancer cell line. Schmitt et al (2012) quote a repair half time for normal lung tissue as long as 4 h and used repair halftimes for the lung cancer cell line NCI-H460 of 15 and 90 min. Since we included both normal and cancer cell lines in our study, our repair constant of 5.9 min is likely to be an underestimate of the repair half-time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken from the literature, repair half-times of 16, 90 and 130 min were used for DU-145, H460 and AGO-1552b cells, respectively. 21,27,28 The calculated values were incorporated into the linear quadratic model to calculate the corresponding surviving fractions. The instant effect was also calculated using the formula: surviving fraction5e…”
Section: Theoretical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%