2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential markers for predicting delayed encephalopathy in patients with acute carbon monoxide poisoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multicenter study showed that age, duration of CO exposure, and GCS score were independent risk factors for DEACMP in ACOP patients 4 . Domestic and international studies have shown that age, gender, occupation, severity of acute-phase poisoning, duration of coma (i.e., the time from when the patient falls into a coma until the patient wakes up), cranial imaging abnormalities, hyperbaric oxygen treatment measures, complications, and post-poisoning mental stimulation are associated with the occurrence of DEACMP [5][6][7][8] , but due to the small sample size or the influence of factors such as the study population and research methods, different opinions and conclusions have been generated. Large samples and high-quality multi-center randomized controlled studies are still needed in the future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multicenter study showed that age, duration of CO exposure, and GCS score were independent risk factors for DEACMP in ACOP patients 4 . Domestic and international studies have shown that age, gender, occupation, severity of acute-phase poisoning, duration of coma (i.e., the time from when the patient falls into a coma until the patient wakes up), cranial imaging abnormalities, hyperbaric oxygen treatment measures, complications, and post-poisoning mental stimulation are associated with the occurrence of DEACMP [5][6][7][8] , but due to the small sample size or the influence of factors such as the study population and research methods, different opinions and conclusions have been generated. Large samples and high-quality multi-center randomized controlled studies are still needed in the future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%