1999
DOI: 10.1007/s001220051187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential of DNA markers in detecting divergence and in analysing heterosis in Indian elite chickpea cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
54
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the number of markers and the variation of the reference populations assayed were the strongest factors affecting GD, MD could be affected by environment, genotype x environment interaction, non-additive genetic effects, and the selection criteria used for the development of the cultivars. In agreement with previous reports a poor correlation between the two types of distances was found (Dillmann et al, 1997;Sant et al, 1999).…”
Section: $Vvrfldwlrq Ehwzhhq Glvwdqfh Phdvxuhvsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the number of markers and the variation of the reference populations assayed were the strongest factors affecting GD, MD could be affected by environment, genotype x environment interaction, non-additive genetic effects, and the selection criteria used for the development of the cultivars. In agreement with previous reports a poor correlation between the two types of distances was found (Dillmann et al, 1997;Sant et al, 1999).…”
Section: $Vvrfldwlrq Ehwzhhq Glvwdqfh Phdvxuhvsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Findings on good correlations between the genetic distance of parents (from performance and molecular marker data) and the performance of their hybrids were similar to those reported in cacao and several species (Ghaderi et al, 1984;Shamsuddin, 1985;Cox and Murphy, 1990;Cruz et al, 1994;Ali et al, 1995;Diers et al, 1996;Xiao et al, 1996;Dias and Kageyama, 1997a;Kisha et al, 1997;Lanza et al, 1997;ManjarrezSandoval et al, 1997;Saghai Maroof et al, 1997;Burkhamer et al, 1998). However, there are several reports describing poor correlations (Vaillancourt et al, 1995;Cerna et al, 1997;Helms et al, 1997;Chowdari et al, 1998;Fabrizius et al, 1998;Perenzin et al, 1998;Tenkouano et al, 1998;Bohn et al, 1999;Joyce et al, 1999;Kidwell et al, 1999;Sant et al, 1999). Such contrasting results showed that association between parental divergence and heterosis remained an unsolved question.…”
Section: $Vvrfldwlrq Ehwzhhq Glvwdqfh Phdvxuhvsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The genetic distance values ranged from 0.09 to 0.27 based on RAPD analysis, whereas genetic distance ranged from 0.42 to 0.61 with oligonucleotide probes. The experimental findings in our laboratory also supported the findings of Sant et al (1999). Out of 78 RAPD primers tested, only 20 primers revealed polymorphisms between the chickpea cultivars (Singh et al 2003).…”
Section: Rflp and Rapd Markerssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The low polymorphism may have been caused by narrow ancestry and self-pollinated nature of the crop (Van Rheenen, 1992). Sant et al (1999) employed RAPD and oligonucleotide probes to assess genetic diversity between 29 elite Indian chickpea cultivars. Out of 35 RAPD primers tested, only 10 primers (29%) generated polymorphic patterns between the cultivars, which indicate narrow genetic base of the cultivated species.…”
Section: Rflp and Rapd Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that RAPD fingerprinting of cultivated chickpea was unable to reveal DNA polymorphism. Low level of polymorphism with RAPD has been reported by Sonnante et al (1997) and Sant et al (1999). These workers studied the potential of DNA markers in detecting divergence in chickpea and reported the inability of RAPD markers to reveal a high level of DNA polymorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%