2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to persist and form viable but non-culturable cells on a food-contact surface subjected to cycles of soiling and chemical treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although sanitizer treatments were effective at reducing significantly the viability and the metabolism of STEC in biofilms, the biofilm matrix either remained or was partly removed depending on the sanitizer (Table 2). These results agree with previous reports (6,7,68,69). Moreover, no significant differences in viability or metabolic activity were seen between seropathotypes or isolates (7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although sanitizer treatments were effective at reducing significantly the viability and the metabolism of STEC in biofilms, the biofilm matrix either remained or was partly removed depending on the sanitizer (Table 2). These results agree with previous reports (6,7,68,69). Moreover, no significant differences in viability or metabolic activity were seen between seropathotypes or isolates (7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Standard cleaning and sanitizing practices are used to reduce sources of microbial contamination on their products. As previously described, strong attachment of biofilms on surfaces may affect the efficiency of sanitizers and protect bacteria against sanitation protocols that are used to reduce contamination (7,68,69). In the present study, we examined if sanitizers commonly used in good sanitation practices were effective at both reducing STEC viability in biofilms and eliminating the biofilm matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The approach is made possible by EMA's efficiency to penetrate dead cells even at relatively low dye concentrations. Whereas early studies employing EMA typically used final dye concentrations of 100 μg/ml (238 μM) (Douglas Inglis et al, 2010;Flekna et al, 2007;Graiver et al, 2010;Marouani-Gradi et al, 2010;Rudi et al, 2005a), concentrations in more recent studies were chosen substantially lower. Cawthorn and Witthuhn (2008) have found that the use of three different EMA concentrations with viable Enterobacter sakazakii cells − 100 (238 μM), 50 (119 μM), and 10 μg/ml (23.8 μM) -resulted in very different PCR product yields of 74, 82 and 92%, respectively (compared with 95, 96, and 97% after PMA treatment).…”
Section: Emamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable research has been directed at evaluating the impact of STEC biofilms on food safety, as well as understanding the mechanisms and genetic basis for biofilm formation by these pathogens (3,11,25,27,38,39). Studies also have investigated the tolerance of STEC cells in biofilms to decontamination reagents (18,19,26,40).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%