2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12518-021-00355-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential of hyperspectral AVIRIS-NG data for vegetation characterization, species spectral separability, and mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These similar findings suggest that the environmental factors, microclimates, plant leaves, solar angles, and changing morphological and spectral properties are different at every growth stage, which will influence weed detection [29]. Humans are unable to differentiate between these plants features using the naked eye; thus, by using spectral signatures, the plants can be differentiated and classified using statistical analysis and machine learning [30][31][32].…”
Section: Classification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These similar findings suggest that the environmental factors, microclimates, plant leaves, solar angles, and changing morphological and spectral properties are different at every growth stage, which will influence weed detection [29]. Humans are unable to differentiate between these plants features using the naked eye; thus, by using spectral signatures, the plants can be differentiated and classified using statistical analysis and machine learning [30][31][32].…”
Section: Classification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Changes in cellulose and leaf water content determine the levels of these characteristics, which can be leveraged to classify plant species [30]. Several wavelengths, including 491, 541, 641, 722, 772, 852, 942, 1047, 1132, 1443, and 2475 nm, were selected and calculated for the purpose of identifying plants species using an artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) [31]. We found that ANN and SVM provided high levels of accuracy of up to 86%.…”
Section: Band Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperspectral data is one promising remote sensing resource that has been used for mapping vegetation and its attributes with high accuracy in many different parts of the world [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In the Florida Everglades, by combining hyperspectral with lidar data Zhang et al were able to map wetland vegetation with an 86% accuracy [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NASA's latest Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer Next-Generation (AVIRIS-NG) hyperspectral camera has 425 spectral bands within the wavelength range 400-2500 nm, and higher pixel resolution 5-10 m depending on the flying height [21]. AVIRIS-NG camera has been flown in many parts of the world to study natural vegetation, crop health, and ecosystem processes [14,16,18,19,22]. In an agricultural setting AVIRIS-NG has been used to quantify plant chlorophyll and identify spectral differences in crop types [19], and for mapping crops species [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advancements in airborne hyperspectral remote sensing provide an efficient approach to retrieve essential information for better characterization of forest fuels [14,[19][20][21]. A number of studies have shown that hyperspectral data is much more effective than multispectral data for detailed vegetation mapping at species or stand scales [14,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. The narrower bandwidths and improved spatial resolution of airborne hyperspectral datasets makes them much more effective than multispectral datasets at distinguishing visually similar vegetation classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%